Page 2 of 2

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Tue Jun 13, 2017 11:59 pm
by Zetharl
And now they are broken. Check their right shoulder, if you have one. Twisted about 90 degrees backward.

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 1:24 am
by Rawr
Yeah I didnt notice that on Monday, did the patch mess with it? :| :mrgreen:

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Wed Jun 14, 2017 10:40 am
by Dewclaw
I love the mount, but the bear trap dangling from the saddle bothers me. Bear traps are illegal (where I live anyway) due to their cruelty, and I work at a vet clinic, and we have treated animals who have been victimized by someone using them illegally. They are cruel, awful things, and do not mesh with my hinter's ideals. :(

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Mon Jun 26, 2017 7:02 pm
by Huntmaster Arwyn
Dewclaw wrote:I love the mount, but the bear trap dangling from the saddle bothers me. Bear traps are illegal (where I live anyway) due to their cruelty, and I work at a vet clinic, and we have treated animals who have been victimized by someone using them illegally. They are cruel, awful things, and do not mesh with my hinter's ideals. :(
Hi Dewclaw! I had similar thoughts when I first saw the bear trap, but I found the perfect solution to the problem. :) I decided that my hunter NEVER uses that particular trap on animals. She only uses it on evil people, like Gul'dan, Kil'jaeden, etc., who REALLY deserve it! Maybe your hunter could do that, too. :)

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 6:13 pm
by Vephriel
I finished up my MM artifact today so I could get the blue wolfhawk (the one that I think looks best, even though I'm still not too fond of them).

It looks nice enough I suppose, but man is that broken wing ever noticeable at certain angles. :( I hope they fix it soon, I can't even pretend to enjoy this mount right now because it bothers me too much to look at the weird arm.

I took screenshots to try to hide it. :lol:

Image

Image

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:08 pm
by Rawr
Stretchy teeth in your 1st pic. :| :mrgreen:

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Wed Jun 28, 2017 8:37 pm
by Vephriel
7.3 PTR is live, as are the bug forums.

I've created a topic mentioning both the broken wolfhawk models and the feathermane idle/sound issue, any support would be good so that they see it!
https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/20757396444

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:01 pm
by Vephriel
Partial(?) good news!

On the PTR today I found out that wolfhawk wings seem somewhat fixed. While in flight the wing is no longer broken, and the teeth seem fixed, however when they're on the ground one wing still sticks out awkwardly to the side.

Still...progress is a good sign!

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Tue Aug 22, 2017 7:44 am
by Divixon
has anyone realised that the wolfhawks mouth tusks stretch? - seems like they are stitched to the roof of its mouth, when you fly or idle fly the tusks stretch in a real odd way

(sorry if someone mentioned this already)

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2017 10:00 pm
by WingedCaduceus
With the Argus patch it looks like the problems with the mount may finally be fixed. Wing looks fine and teeth aren't sticking - at least for the moment.

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Sat Sep 02, 2017 7:33 pm
by Nefretiti
I like the wolfhawks but I won't be getting one, nor the ability to tame feathermanes since I don't do LFG anymore.
Grats to those of you who got theirs :)

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 8:57 am
by GormanGhaste
I feel the same way. The sheer amount of open world content locked behind dungeons this expansion is too much, a poor decision by blizzard.

Re: Wolfhawk - upcoming hunter class mount

Posted: Sun Sep 03, 2017 6:09 pm
by Nefretiti
I would have loved to be able to tame an owlkitty at least but it's not to be.