LOL I really feel pity for hunters with Stockholm syndrome.
I feel pity for condescending hunters.
I, and other hunters here, have good solid reasons for not wanting this total revamp you suggest. Oh, and by the way? I wasn't one of those against minimum range. I actually feel many of us cheered to see that removed.
there's no solid reason wanting to be dazed. Hunters already penalized if they use cheetah; less damage for giving up hawk.
People don't "want" to be dazed. We accept the dazed effect as something that's supposed to give ballance. You're right that we also lose some dps for not being in Hawk, but appearantly that's not enough for Blizzard so we have to pay either with being dazed or "giving up" a glyph spot. And again, saying "others don't get dazed" is neither here nor there because those "others" don't have the ability to use all their attacks while moving faster.
And may I remind you that you didn't come here asking "do you want daze removed?" - if you had, the reactions and votes probably would've been very different. You asked for a complete overhaul of this aspect with a very specific proposal of how it should be. That's what people have answered to. Our argument isn't "dazed is awsome and it should always be there". We're simply saying that Cheetah as it is now is not as useless as you make it out to be and that we don't want it changed completely.
Yes, the removal of the dazed effect would be nice, but we don't want Cheetah to be a travel form or a sprint - we want it to remain what it is: The ability to run fast and attack with full range at the same time.