Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
Treat others with respect. Report, don't respond. Read the complete forum rules.
- Zorikune
- Journeyman Hunter
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:31 pm
- Realm: Area 52 (H)
- Gender: Male
Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
[51012] = "Shimmershell",
[51024] = "Nematoss",
[50917] = "Yip",
[51032] = "Muffin",
[50918] = "Yelper",
[51072] = "Vulpos",
[50933] = "Dormis the Cub",
[50900] = "Pollix",
[50961] = "Soft-Shell",
[50969] = "Dampscale",
[50927] = "Ursolon",
[50990] = "Nakk the Thunderer",
[50981] = "Luk'hok",
[18699] = "Netherstorm Rare Chimaera UNUSED",
[50943] = "Tusky",
[50358] = "Allestria",
[50870] = "The Eviscerator",
[50845] = "Thousand-Tooth",
[50999] = "Thorix",
[50863] = "Granulax",
[51016] = "Murr",
[51020] = "The Invisible Stalker",
[50872] = "Teryx",
[50914] = "Rendclaw",
[51049] = "Bongo",
[50941] = "Squealer",
[50889] = "Limpwing the Swift",
[5796] = "Ben",
[50938] = "The Sungrass Stalker",
[50883] = "Pathrunner",
[50965] = "Niles",
[17075] = "Sandworm",
[50976] = "Saltwater Behemoth",
[50847] = "Proceratos",
[50985] = "Poundfist",
[50736] = "Acidous",
[50867] = "Bloodclaw",
[50871] = "Velocitus",
[50953] = "Dunge",
[50879] = "Herdstalker",
[50887] = "Longstride",
[51030] = "Onych",
[50899] = "Pili",
[50911] = "Sharptooth",
[51056] = "Opterax",
[50919] = "Moonwaker the Baying",
[51050] = "Bonobus",
[51054] = "Dak the Hardened",
[50935] = "Charger",
[50050] = "Shok'sharak",
[59071] = "D'uuurps",
[51074] = "Alope",
[50959] = "Karkin",
[50963] = "Scalehide the Maw",
[51019] = "Narakk",
[50844] = "Tyranitar",
[50979] = "The River Stalker",
[50860] = "Nis'delith",
[51064] = "Glitterweb",
[50868] = "Skree",
[50921] = "Leonis",
[50928] = "Kodir the Cave Dweller",
[50909] = "Growler",
[51015] = "Silthide",
[50912] = "Keen-Ears the Tracker",
[50920] = "Canus",
[51051] = "Jumpi the Swinger",
[51055] = "Clattershell",
[50932] = "Timbercraw",
[50936] = "Mudkin the Wallower",
[50950] = "Felspike",
[50956] = "Pinner",
[50890] = "Deathsting",
[50968] = "Gullet",
[50972] = "Mugs",
[50849] = "Blistermaw",
[50853] = "Corpsegnaw the Feeder",
[50954] = "Bisque",
[50861] = "Nor-Nasam",
[50992] = "Gorok",
[51043] = "B'lok the Shadow Mutt",
[50877] = "Halfclaw",
- Lisaara
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 17419
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:11 pm
- Realm: Moon Guard
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Location: US
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
- Zorikune
- Journeyman Hunter
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:31 pm
- Realm: Area 52 (H)
- Gender: Male
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
- Eternallylostx
- Artisan Hunter
- Posts: 761
- Joined: Sat Sep 01, 2012 1:42 pm
- Realm: Main is on Wyrmrest, alts on Mok'nathal
- Gender: Female
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
I might just be blind, but where's Solix? I haven't seen any of these.Junrei wrote:I've seen a lot of those names before....like Solix and the like. Aren't a lot of those already on live? O_o;
Signature credit to Ashaine; avatars by various people. Thanks! | Tumblr
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
~Signature made by Serenith~~Signature made by Serenith~
- Kalliope
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 14062
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
- Realm: Dethecus
- Location: Thedas
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
Anthiss and Karkin definitely exist (Molten Front), as do Bonobos (Valley of the Four Winds, spelled this way instead) and Little Samras (old Hillsbrad).
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
Also, Solix's ID is 54321 lol! xD
~Signature made by Serenith~~Signature made by Serenith~
- Lisaara
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 17419
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:11 pm
- Realm: Moon Guard
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Location: US
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
- Kalliope
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 14062
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
- Realm: Dethecus
- Location: Thedas
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
Doubtful; Little Samras is already there. These are probably just copies of the finalized NPCs, either as works in progress or bases for new NPCs or something to that effect.Tsuki wrote:Ah. Maybe it's some sort of CoT thing?
Somehow, I never realized this. Well played, Solix.Tsuki wrote:Also, Solix's ID is 54321 lol! xD
He doesn't, but his name did come up recently in regards to possible devilsaur names, which is why it seems more familiar.Junrei wrote:I think Blistermaw also exists.
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!
- Zorikune
- Journeyman Hunter
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:31 pm
- Realm: Area 52 (H)
- Gender: Male
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
- Lisaara
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 17419
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:11 pm
- Realm: Moon Guard
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Location: US
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
Ah! Right. I knew I saw the name. Several other names looked familiar but I wasn't sure if they were live or not.
- Kalliope
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 14062
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
- Realm: Dethecus
- Location: Thedas
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
Yeah, I'm on the fence about "Ben." I thought immediately of Grizzled Ben, who was added in 5.1, but with his name being so simple, it's hard to tell if there's any connection.Junrei wrote:Several other names looked familiar but I wasn't sure if they were live or not.
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!
- Lisaara
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 17419
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:11 pm
- Realm: Moon Guard
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Location: US
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
Yeah he was one of the ones I was like "...crap I've seen that name...but...is he live or...?"Kalliope wrote:Yeah, I'm on the fence about "Ben." I thought immediately of Grizzled Ben, who was added in 5.1, but with his name being so simple, it's hard to tell if there's any connection.Junrei wrote:Several other names looked familiar but I wasn't sure if they were live or not.
Also did anyone else besides me giggle at "Deathsting?" XD
- Zorikune
- Journeyman Hunter
- Posts: 112
- Joined: Fri Jan 07, 2011 9:31 pm
- Realm: Area 52 (H)
- Gender: Male
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
This Ben npc is supposed to be the pet of another npc named Grash Thunderbrew.Kalliope wrote:Yeah, I'm on the fence about "Ben." I thought immediately of Grizzled Ben, who was added in 5.1, but with his name being so simple, it's hard to tell if there's any connection.Junrei wrote:Several other names looked familiar but I wasn't sure if they were live or not.
- Bowno
- Community Resource
- Posts: 2347
- Joined: Sat Dec 08, 2012 5:21 am
- Realm: Moon Guard
- Gender: Female
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
Isn't he a Trademarked Pokemon...? Blizz might get in trouble if they use that o3o[50844] = "Tyranitar"
Siggy under construction!
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
If they didn't get into trouble for copying the fundamental concepts of Pokémon for their pet battle system, I doubt using the name "Tyranitar" will cause any problemsBowno wrote:Isn't he a Trademarked Pokemon...? Blizz might get in trouble if they use that o3o[50844] = "Tyranitar"
Avatar made by the awesome LupisDarkmoon. Tameable giraffes please!
Pets Wishlist:
Goats
Yaks
Shoveltusks
Stags
Talbuks/Gazelles
Giraffes!
WoD and Legion best expansions! 6 down, 1 to go!
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
I'm not a lawyer, but I think you can't trademark or copyright stuff like fundamental game mechanics, at least not with the differences there are between actual Pokemon and Pet Battles. Names, however, can fall under trademark and if a tm owner doesn't act on it, he may lose it (IIRC).Loki wrote:If they didn't get into trouble for copying the fundamental concepts of Pokémon for their pet battle system, I doubt using the name "Tyranitar" will cause any problemsBowno wrote:Isn't he a Trademarked Pokemon...? Blizz might get in trouble if they use that o3o[50844] = "Tyranitar"
Would appreciate a response from someone with more knowledge in trademark and copyright laws to confirm or deny.
- Ijomi
- Expert Hunter
- Posts: 462
- Joined: Tue Sep 14, 2010 9:38 pm
- Realm: Moon Guard
- Gender: Female
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
This is a rarespawn giant in Deepholm, has been since Cata.[50059] = "Golgarok",
Let me give Runty a good home.
Flight Rising!
deviantART!
- Lisaara
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 17419
- Joined: Thu Sep 09, 2010 9:11 pm
- Realm: Moon Guard
- Gender: Genderfluid
- Location: US
- Contact:
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
I'm not a lawyer, but I think you can't trademark or copyright stuff like fundamental game mechanics, at least not with the differences there are between actual Pokemon and Pet Battles. Names, however, can fall under trademark and if a tm owner doesn't act on it, he may lose it (IIRC).Zhinru wrote:If they didn't get into trouble for copying the fundamental concepts of Pokémon for their pet battle system, I doubt using the name "Tyranitar" will cause any problemsLoki wrote:
Isn't he a Trademarked Pokemon...? Blizz might get in trouble if they use that o3o
Would appreciate a response from someone with more knowledge in trademark and copyright laws to confirm or deny.[/quote]
No you can't copyright stuff like that. Names can be tmed but they can still be used so long as the said name isn't the actual thing in question. Like for example...Pokemon has Tyranitar but if WoW uses the name and it looks nothing like the Pokemon Tyranitar, then it's okay.
- Kurasu
- Community Resource
- Posts: 2539
- Joined: Fri Oct 01, 2010 8:38 am
- Realm: Emerald Dreams (EU)
- Gender: Male with both gender toons
- Location: Ontario, Canada, but my heart (and account) is in Europe!
Re: Searching for Any New Tameable Rares for 5.2
Mmmmno. Using the name can still get you into trouble if it's TMed. Basically, it's a matter of whether they think it's important enough to break out the lawyers or not. The more distinctive the name, the more likely of someone making enough noise to be heard.Junrei wrote:Names can be tmed but they can still be used so long as the said name isn't the actual thing in question. Like for example...Pokemon has Tyranitar but if WoW uses the name and it looks nothing like the Pokemon Tyranitar, then it's okay.
For instance, Tyranitar, they probably wouldn't get into trouble for simply because it's 'Just another Poke'mon'. However, if they created a creature with the name Pikachu, even if it looked and acted nothing like Pikachu, then the banhammer would come down. The same with the mechanics. Using even the specific concept is shaky, but they have enough differences that lawyers would be able to make it less efficient to just acknowledge that it's influenced heavily by the idea, and might be considered a tribute, but is more a 'remix' than 'a copy'. And, of course, good luck at getting the trademark on a name that's 'ye basic name'.
Copyright-wise, it comes down to whether the person whose right is being infringed wants to stand up and *say* something. If they don't, then it's considered a taciturn acceptance of it and no law is being broken. You don't *have* to demand royalties for someone using your copyrighted stuff.