Ok there sugar let me poke a few holes in thisTaluwen wrote:if you can link something considered a mount in the wild that is tameable, I'll be more inclined to believe that. If its saddle-less, it's not a mount. it just has the same appearance.Raydex-of-the-dawn wrote:However, we have saddleless mounts, too - look at the kitties, for instance. A saddleless pheonix would be the same.Taluwen wrote:
Which is the only tameable mount so doesn't really help the argument. XD also those 'mounts' act as pets for those orcs. That's the only reason they're tameable because they're actually pets.
And truth be told, I don't think a phoenix could be or should be truly tamed. it's a majestic beast, legendary even. if we can't even get a dragon to be tamed, a phoenix is beyond our reach for sure.
A- That silly black wolf pet from Hellfire Ramparts comes to mind
B- Blizzards reasons for non tamable dragons is the fact that dragons are a sentient race... its like trying to tame a gnome
C- Phoenix to my understanding arent sentient, just a magic bird... like tameing any spirit beast out there
D- all the expansions have a theme that are pets tend to follow such as B.C being between divine and demonic powers we obtained far more magically infused pets then Vanilla ( Nether Ray, Warpstalker, etc) And WOTLK seems to follow the theme of life and death... so then we get spirit beasts... animals who have either brushed death or embraced it to become something more, dont know about you but i see Cata and an elemental theme, meaning more elemental pets are fair game
Xoxo Gossip Girl