Re: Mists of Pandaria
Posted: Thu Aug 11, 2011 11:17 am
I doubt that. Way too many complaints about them still. They still have issues balancing the vanilla classes.
A fun place to chat about hunter pets in the World of Warcraft.
https://forums.wow-petopia.com/
Exactly. They will never fully balance the classes without completely homogenising them. It's simply undoable. Which is not a barrier to introducing new classes, because that would mean no classes at all. DKs are at least comparable to other classes on balance scale right now, so they can probably try out a new one.Jessibelle wrote:I doubt that. Way too many complaints about them still. They still have issues balancing the vanilla classes.
*Snerk*Jessibelle wrote:Yeah. But knowing Blizz, they will bend to the cries on the forums.
Um considering the DK is the only heroic class we have, thats all we have to compare them with. So to say its the least comparable is kinda false and that is a barrier. Why? Because they had such a hard time(still do) balancing the DK out.Andine wrote:Exactly. They will never fully balance the classes without completely homogenising them. It's simply undoable. Which is not a barrier to introducing new classes, because that would mean no classes at all. DKs are at least comparable to other classes on balance scale right now, so they can probably try out a new one.Jessibelle wrote:I doubt that. Way too many complaints about them still. They still have issues balancing the vanilla classes.
Monks without psionics are even more bland - it would be very hard to create an interesting gameplay mechanics to draw players to that class. In Brewmaster's case, however, mechanics write themselves.
You know it's true. They think the forums are the majority.Worba wrote:*Snerk*Jessibelle wrote:Yeah. But knowing Blizz, they will bend to the cries on the forums.
I think he meant that the class is AT LEAST (as in, sorta... kinda... you know) comparable in balancing terms to regular classes.Jessibelle wrote:Um considering the DK is the only heroic class we have, thats all we have to compare them with. So to say its the least comparable is kinda false and that is a barrier. Why? Because they had such a hard time(still do) balancing the DK out.Andine wrote:Exactly. They will never fully balance the classes without completely homogenising them. It's simply undoable. Which is not a barrier to introducing new classes, because that would mean no classes at all. DKs are at least comparable to other classes on balance scale right now, so they can probably try out a new one.Jessibelle wrote:I doubt that. Way too many complaints about them still. They still have issues balancing the vanilla classes.
Monks without psionics are even more bland - it would be very hard to create an interesting gameplay mechanics to draw players to that class. In Brewmaster's case, however, mechanics write themselves.
I think it depends honestly - when forumgoers have some massive common reaction to a recent game change, they tend to listen (generally, somewhat) and take some sort of action.*Jessibelle wrote:You know it's true. They think the forums are the majority.Worba wrote:*Snerk*Jessibelle wrote:Yeah. But knowing Blizz, they will bend to the cries on the forums.
>.>Kirsten wrote:I almost couldn't give a damn what the next expansion is as long as there isn't more freaking dragons. They're cool to look at, but the fights are ALWAYS THE SAME.
Worba wrote:>.>Kirsten wrote:I almost couldn't give a damn what the next expansion is as long as there isn't more freaking dragons. They're cool to look at, but the fights are ALWAYS THE SAME.
<.<
Upon entering the Mists of Pandaria our intrepid heroes discover...
THE PANDAREN HAVE ALL BEEN EATEN.
BY DRAGONS.
New race: PLAYABLE DRAGONS.
^ This! XDWorba wrote:>.>Kirsten wrote:I almost couldn't give a damn what the next expansion is as long as there isn't more freaking dragons. They're cool to look at, but the fights are ALWAYS THE SAME.
<.<
Upon entering the Mists of Pandaria our intrepid heroes discover...
THE PANDAREN HAVE ALL BEEN EATEN.
BY DRAGONS.
New race: PLAYABLE DRAGONS.
I would honestly, probably kill something small, cute, furry, and innocent if we had playable dragons.Jessibelle wrote:^ This! XDWorba wrote:>.>Kirsten wrote:I almost couldn't give a damn what the next expansion is as long as there isn't more freaking dragons. They're cool to look at, but the fights are ALWAYS THE SAME.
<.<
Upon entering the Mists of Pandaria our intrepid heroes discover...
THE PANDAREN HAVE ALL BEEN EATEN.
BY DRAGONS.
New race: PLAYABLE DRAGONS.
This cracked me up!Worba wrote:>.>Kirsten wrote:I almost couldn't give a damn what the next expansion is as long as there isn't more freaking dragons. They're cool to look at, but the fights are ALWAYS THE SAME.
<.<
Upon entering the Mists of Pandaria our intrepid heroes discover...
THE PANDAREN HAVE ALL BEEN EATEN.
BY DRAGONS.
New race: PLAYABLE DRAGONS.
You will think the old gods have nothing to do with the panda story line..... then blizzard is going to be like "ya the old gods corrupted the bad guy" then we will all be like excuse my language "the fuck?"Kayb wrote:i second the notion of no more damn dragons for awhile. i'm tired of all the mounts for em too
be nice to step away from old gods for a little bit too
You resist. You cling to your life as if it actually matters. You will learn.Kayb wrote:be nice to step away from old gods for a little bit too
Worba wrote:The old gods need a breather after having their asses handed to them in wotlk and cata...