Re: Why should SV / MM hunters get Exotic Beast families?
Posted: Sat Jun 12, 2010 6:25 pm
I don't see that working out well. Some pet models would not work well with armour on them and just look ugly :S
A fun place to chat about hunter pets in the World of Warcraft.
https://forums.wow-petopia.com/
How can you say no to an armored sporebat!? HOW!?cowmuflage wrote:I don't see that working out well. Some pet models would not work well with armour on them and just look ugly :S
And see, I'm a step ahead of you in that you could choose whether or not to display it. And maybe not all people would think armor looked ugly on all pets. You may think an armored tallstrider would look silly, but I think Rainey would rather like a shining suit of armor.cowmuflage wrote:I don't see that working out well. Some pet models would not work well with armour on them and just look ugly :S
But we already have the Spectral Tiger mount! It has armor!!! It would work, I tell you!cowmuflage wrote:heh that would be cool. But some others would not. How would you put armour on a worm it would just fall off lol. a spirit beast well it might just fall thru it or something lol
If it stays on the star-ponies, it can stay on a spirit beast..cowmuflage wrote: How would you put armour on a worm it would just fall off lol. a spirit beast well it might just fall thru it or something lol
Saturo wrote:Well, in that case, it sounds sort of like what they're planning to do with BM Mastery in Cata, so you'll see a variety of it, at least.
I forget what the break-point is, but in my gear-set it made sense to go ahead and start gemming ArP. Once you are at that level, you are only really raiding, so, pet damage is not that big a deal. And it's not like it was a direction I chose. Blizz has so much ArP on the gear now, that it eventually happens. They are giving you ArP instead of Agi, Hit, Crit, or AP, so it makes sense to go with the flow.Acherontia wrote:BM goes through the AP->Agi->ArP progression just like everyone else, but at different gear levels. I personally prefer not to go for ArP as that decreases pet dmg output, though increasing your own--I think if you do that, why not just spec MM : /
Huh?... that's not my interpretation of it.. the mastery bonuses are basically that, stat buffs. I don't remember anything about items.Saturo wrote:Well, in that case, it sounds sort of like what they're planning to do with BM Mastery in Cata, so you'll see a variety of it, at least.
But the mastery points themselves were generic, weren't they? and your combined mastery bonus just applied to the trees depending on how many points you put in them.Saturo wrote:Yeah, you get mastery rating on your gear, let's call it "petgear". "Petgear" increases your pets damage, like normal gear. Sure, not really the same, but it works similarly, if you read the post I was referring to.
Like maybe having the BM pets stay original size? Now that would be cool. Or maybe just have them reduce by 25% instead of 75%. lol Plus, I'd love if BM had more pet buff abilities. I don't want the other specs cool shots. I learned that when I dual specced MM (what a waste of $1,000 G) I want to be able to back up my pet. Yes, I said it... to back up my pet. That to me is what Bm should be about. A special bond between hunter and pet that allows our pets to do more than a regular pet. Maybe let everyone tame all beasts, but let BM pets have a special attack all to their own. Think of it as a MM shot but through our pets.Quelthasa wrote:Jumped in and gave my 2 cents
Anyway, the visual effects of the BM spec also counts to many, mostly the exotic pets are big, ferocious and looks deadly, with some neat tools (Like the chimera in your signature)
Even if the MM / SV specs got them, I would be fine with that, in trade of something that is visual, perhaps making the last talent in BM scale the pets to grow abit bigger, because as you said, we are masters of beasts, and -our- beasts should look stronger than the SV / MM beasts without looking at the HP and buffs we get from BM tree.
Think that idea would keep the feeling of being a BM still hang around, because.. The size of that devilsaur is NEAT, agree there
Tahlian wrote:Slickrock wrote:Frankly, I would like to see the opposite.. take pets away from MM entirely. Make them into true sharpshooters. Just give them an extra talent to make up for the wolf buff, and remove the pets entirely from that tree. SV would only get cunning pets for the utility. Then BM would be truly unique and different.
If you think it's not fair to take our exotic pets away from us, why is it fair to take every pet away from the Marks or Survival hunters, some of whom do love their pets and have as deep a bond with their pets as the beast masters do, but must spec MM or SV for particular reasons, i.e., being in a serious progression guild, playstyle, just can't stand BM like I can't stand MM/SV, etc?
That's not any more right. And we'd probably lose a lot of hunters from the class if that were the case - and perhaps might even lose some of the posters from this board, who aren't beast masters but still love their furry friends in Azeroth.
Kryte wrote:I don't raid, so I can't really speak to the viability of anything. I'm basing my argument on the doom and gloom pronouncements in this thread, that BM would be a dead spec if not for exotics. To me, that sounds ridiculous. Now, I love pets, but that ultimately comes down to saying, "I'm only this spec because of a cosmetic." That, to me, is messed up. A person should be, say, speccing Shadow because they like the spec, not because Shadow form turns them purple. If that really is the only reason that people spec BM, then there's something fundamentally wrong with the spec, and it should be reworked.Gimlion wrote:I'd still like to see a Ranger class made... Something that doesn't get pets, but can Either be like a MM hunter, or a Rogue, or some third spec, that way, the fools who just use pets as stat sticks can either re-roll or be left out by true hunters. That, and I'd just love to have something similar to how Legolas can fight. LoTR ftw. =)
And I would disagree on your statement about how Exotics are the only thing keeping BM 'afloat' Kryte. Hell, with how I've seen some hardcore BM raiders do things, and put their adversaries in their places, i wouldn't even call it a 'Drowning' spec.
I really liked this comment. I was mm/bm on my last hunter and yes it was JUST to have a chance to try the exotics. There was no other reason to use a spec that was considerably that much weakereven in basic PVE it would take 3 times longer to hunt and skin than when I was in MM. I know it's stupid but eventually I became very embarrassed walking around with an exotic in public, like I was a spectacle of weakness. I gave up BM.
Just my opinion but they need to make exotics tamable by all and make BM a strong solid spec.
For BM abilities? They should have their own shots in the same way mm & sv. Maybe allow them to have pets that are swarmslike a colony of rats, pack of wolves, swarm of meerkats.
I've seen hunters that do run around and do dungeons without pets. I think it's just a little creepy, not sure why...