Page 2 of 10
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 2:59 am
by Vephriel
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 3:12 am
by Kalliope
*giggles at the herd*
They look so....so....
casual.
^
This is best viewed with
this playing in the background.
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 4:07 am
by Rower
Not really surprised, and I won't cry if they aren't tamable on live. I really hope we get clefthooves and stags this time <3
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 4:39 am
by Meggers
I definitely feel the porky should be a tameable pet. The worms just seem too out there for me personally for them to continue their allowance. XD
/edit
Wait, mushan aren't tameable? I totally thought they would be! Here's hoping those come in too.
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 4:46 am
by Sesamee
Yaks, please!! Pretty please with a Nagrand Cherry on top??
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 6:11 am
by Kurasu
Slickrock wrote:So besides new skins, that leaves us with Cranes as the only new tameable beast for MoP? (I mean completely new beasts, not new (pretty) tigers and turtles.
Remember: cranes are classified as 'Tallstriders'. So technically *they're* not 'new beasts' either at the moment! But it's still early.

Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 6:35 am
by Lupis
I saw that coming, but I do honestly think Porcupines will become tamable. Just… bigger. xD
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 7:43 am
by Akyo
ok then.
Then id like Mana serpents
http://www.wowwiki.com/Mana_serpent Marsh walkers
http://www.wowwiki.com/Marsh_Walker and Mana wyrms
http://www.wowwiki.com/Mana_wyrm and a new wolf please thank you.
anyway. i was afraid this would be the case on the worms but for some reason i found porkypines to be beliveable pets. LOOK AT THOSE SPIKES!
Im curious to what they may plan to make tameable or if its just ideas they have in the back of their minds that may or may not see the light before the end of beta.
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:33 am
by Meggers
(NGL been wanting mana serpents forever, Can't see the walkers being a pet though)
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 8:52 am
by GormanGhaste
Yes, the silk worms' current model is just too low poly (although it Would look better if the tamed size were smaller). But silkworms Should be tameable! Blizz will have to pry Dapple from my beta's cold dead hands.
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 9:32 am
by Miacoda
So apparently I am the weirdest person ever.
I actually saw the silkworms as a more likely candidate than the porcupines (with a slightly smaller tamed size).

Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:15 am
by Ickabob
I wouldn't mind giving up porcupines if it meant getting hydras and maybe mushan.
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:21 am
by Kalliope
Ickabob wrote:I wouldn't mind giving up porcupines if it meant getting hydras and maybe mushan.

Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:39 am
by Miacoda
Yup. Caly is officially the porcupine ambassador.
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:40 am
by Ickabob
The cuteness! Argg! Can't fight it!
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 11:49 am
by Rhapture
Kalliope wrote:*giggles at the herd*
They look so....so....
casual.
^
This is best viewed with
this playing in the background.
I just laughed way harder at this then I should have. His little waddle is perfectly timed.
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 12:04 pm
by zedxrgal
I'm so adding those to my signature AND avatar rotation. I mean ..................... how could you resist sad porcupine!
But .................................... HYDRAS!!! And basilisks please.
We need sad eyes hydra & basilisk pictures stat!
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 12:09 pm
by Ceravan
Slackers, y'all forget my Basilisks. Must have the red outland one, gotta have it, gotta catch em all
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 12:11 pm
by zedxrgal
Um Sir Nugget I did not forget the basilisk! *points to post above yours*
Re: Porcupine and silkworm tameability is unintentional
Posted: Thu May 10, 2012 12:15 pm
by Sasrei
Hmm im not to sure but the silkworm could go into the worm family, would fit alright there. I mean its cuter then most but you know gotta share the MoP cuteness. And the porcupines they have spikes, fel boars have spikes, it could work! (im vying for you kally!) Or they could be put in a new family called the vermin family, with a new type of blind skill or interrupt.
If we dont get the silkworms id love to finally be able to tame the gryeworms, I mean we have some pets that are elemental like the shale spiders, gem cats, rune dogs so why not them to? And the Quilen I think they should go into the dog family mostly cause.. dogs need some love but it would work in the cat family to.. im flexible.
Hydras of course would be awesome, stags. Id love to see some new pet families like the Mushan, maybe some new variations on old families as well. Would love to see a new type of devilsaur and corehounds. New spirit beast would rock *nod nod* maybe something other then a cat.. spirit beast devilsaur or hydra would be cool.