A fun place to chat about hunter pets in the World of Warcraft.
https://forums.wow-petopia.com/
There actually is a variant model in the database that lacks the engines but retains the armour. I think it still has the stumpy metal tail though.MaximumOverdrive wrote:The rylak flying animation will forever bug me, but I like it overall. More than the armored version (if they got rid of the jet engines and the big blob of metal on the tail, I would totally love the armored version).
Oops. Has it retained the sounds of the armoured version??Shinryu Masaki wrote:Oh cool, MMOC posted a video of it!
Why...
why the hell am I hearing the jet engines when it's flying?
Wain wrote:There actually is a variant model in the database that lacks the engines but retains the armour. I think it still has the stumpy metal tail though.MaximumOverdrive wrote:The rylak flying animation will forever bug me, but I like it overall. More than the armored version (if they got rid of the jet engines and the big blob of metal on the tail, I would totally love the armored version).
I actually think the existing tail of the armoured version is an unfinished part of the model or maybe a failed experiment. You'll see it has a ring at the end for something to attach. In its model folder is a ball that I think was meant to go on the end. Maybe like a spiked ball of destruction. It either wasn't working right or they just forgot it. Anyway I believe that's why the tail looks unfinished.
That's it! That's what an armoured rylak should look like. They just look wrong without their ballsLupen202 wrote:You're right... how weird. I snapped this during the Beastlord Darmac fight.Wain wrote:I actually think the existing tail of the armoured version is an unfinished part of the model or maybe a failed experiment. You'll see it has a ring at the end for something to attach. In its model folder is a ball that I think was meant to go on the end. Maybe like a spiked ball of destruction. It either wasn't working right or they just forgot it. Anyway I believe that's why the tail looks unfinished.MaximumOverdrive wrote:The rylak flying animation will forever bug me, but I like it overall. More than the armored version (if they got rid of the jet engines and the big blob of metal on the tail, I would totally love the armored version).
Wain wrote:That's it! That's what an armoured rylak should look like. They just look wrong without their balls
I am perpetually immature because I totally logged in just to quote this and post that it made me snicker XDWain wrote: That's it! That's what an armoured rylak should look like. They just look wrong without their balls