Re: Why should SV / MM hunters get Exotic Beast families?
Posted: Mon Aug 30, 2010 4:21 am
remember when BM received its first major overhaul? like, a year or two before BC? holy moly, was it ever THE spec to be for raw power
A fun place to chat about hunter pets in the World of Warcraft.
https://forums.wow-petopia.com/
Rhyela wrote:People keep making it sound like we want to take the BM tree as it is right now (or in Cata), then take Exotics away. That's not what I'm saying. I was saying that ideally I would like the exotics tag to go away completely; and furthermore, get rid of any family-specific special abilities to boot, and just give pets talent trees that we get to pick. That way we truly would have the freedom of choice to bring any pet anywhere we want without gimping ourselves, our groups, or our raids. I hear that's Mania's vision, too.
But until BM gets fixed (and I'm sorry, I don't have any suggestions because I'm not a game developer >.>), then BM should keep exotics. But honestly, I feel their final talent is pretty pathetic anyway.
I don't understand why people make it seem like I want to just rip it away from them NAO RIGHT NAO!!! I'm BM at heart, just like the rest of you, but I try to keep an open mind and hope for a time when we can bring our favorite pet regardless of whether it's a devilsaur or a frigging monkey, and regardless of spec. The other two specs have people who love their pets just as much as those in BM. I'm survival right now because I personally feel the BM shot rotation is boring and too restrictive for movement-heavy fights. But that doesn't make me a heartless jerk who'd throw my pet over a cliff if the situation required it.
I was BM for a long time, well before exotics were even in the picture. It worked back then, and I still had fun. The devs need to go back in time and see what BM looked like back then, and bring it back (because I don't remember exactly to be honest, lol).
I think you're missing the major third, which is a good chunk of people:Turgus wrote:To me this entire thread seems to boil down to two groups of thought. (Yes there are probably more.)
The first group enjoys having their exotic pet being a BM hunter, and feel that it is what helps define them from the other specced hunters and would not want to give that up baring some other major BM defining ability. (See duel pet talent idea.)
The other group also enjoys exotic pets, but they want to have them while being specced in a different tree (Marksman or Survival.)
They do not know what ability to give BM hunters to replace it, but they are against BM hunters getting two pets.
Turgus wrote:To me this entire thread seems to boil down to two groups of thought. (Yes there are probably more.)
.......
It just seems to me that people want to have both the Power and Utility of MM or SV while getting the cool and unique pets that BM gets. (i.e they get everything, and have to sacrifice nothing)
Thats just how I see it.
I feel bad that there's probably people out there who like a certain spec, but can't have the pet they want with that spec. Just seems silly.
I would love to have Explosive Shot while raiding! Hey! I can!!! All I need to do is to activate my secondary spec, bye bye Devilsaur/Core Hound/ Spirit Beast / x, see you in about 3 hours!
so trueTurgus wrote:In the end I feel that BM hunters shouldn't have to have Exotic Pets as a class defining ability. There should be something else, something substantial that is as useful and powerful as the other specs 51st talent.
And the only thing I can think of that fits with the BM theme, would have a substantial impact on gameplay like the other 51st talents is the Duel Pet Talent Idea. Nothing else comes close.
I think you're missing the major third, which is a good chunk of people:
The BM hunters who do not want "exotics"--fairly useless, sparkly pets--to be the defining characteristic of the spec. I'm happy raiding as a BM hunter with a wolf.
I love my devilsaur, but the spirit beasts, worms etc just aren't enough to "define" a spec. I just think we need something more than pretty pets to define a class; there's no excuse for them being weaker than all the others. Then again, regarding that weakness--I don't see it >.< Been out-dpsing mm/surv hunters consistently. And I still would have no problem letting them have exotics too--it's just not a big deal to me. I feel bad that there's probably people out there who like a certain spec, but can't have the pet they want with that spec. Just seems silly.
I didn't mention the group of BM hunters that don't use Exotic pets for a specific reason.I think you're missing the major third, which is a good chunk of people:
The BM hunters who do not want "exotics"--fairly useless, sparkly pets--to be the defining characteristic of the spec. I'm happy raiding as a BM hunter with a wolf.
Congratulations, seriously. It is pretty rare for a hunter (from my experience) to hold onto a pet that long.Well, on my hunter, I have a bm spec, and mm. On BOTH I use the same pet, my kitty. I love him, I have screen shots of us predating when most of you probably started playing. I got him the minute I could.
Blizzard has done away with the damage bonus that exotic pets get over their counterparts. So the only difference in their damage is specifically based on their species specific skills. These are going to be changed in Cataclysm to various buffs/debuffs more akin to the rhino ability than they are currently.My point is, that even when I am bm I still use that cat. If you honestly want BM to become anything more than a second rate brushover you should hope like hell they give exotic to all specs. Then you know what they will do. They will actually balance you around damage and utility instead of your shiny pet.
I am not sure where this comes from.But go ahead, be like the retard paladins that want to hang onto their bubble as long as they can.
Yes, I am determined to hang onto my Tame Exotic Pets ability, it is not some game breaking mechanic, which allows me to do tons of damage while making me completely immune to retaliation. (unless the opponent just happens to be a priest)They want to keep it, even with the duration being nerfed etc. They are determined to hang onto that bubble.
Not entirely true. Trexs are still above the rest in what they can do, but spirit beasts were hit hard to keep them from becoming FOTM. The exotics do give a better family racial generally, even if they aren't balanced.Turgus wrote:Blizzard has done away with the damage bonus that exotic pets get over their counterparts. So the only difference in their damage is specifically based on their species specific skills. These are going to be changed in Cataclysm to various buffs/debuffs more akin to the rhino ability than they are currently.
So in effect, they are going to be balanced around type i.e utility (tenacity, ferocity, cunning) and damage (buff/debuff) like you mentioned.
In essence, they are going to be just "shiny pets."
Turgus wrote:I didn't mention the group of BM hunters that don't use Exotic pets for a specific reason.
In any real sense, they don't have a stake in this debate.
They won't be affected if the other hunter specs either get or don't get the ability to tame and use Exotic Pets.
But, in fairness, they do have a voice and an opinion that does matters.
http://thehuntersrefuge.blogspot.com/20 ... anges.htmlPets -- We haven't done our design pass on them yet. The design is for them to no longer receive raid buff since they get complete scaling from the master (and we don't want them to double dip). Their abilities will be divided into 3 categories: basic focus dumps (e.g. Claw), specials (e.g. web), and exotic abilities for the BM exotic pets. Specials never cost focus and basics have short cooldowns but meaningful damage. All pets will do the same dps. We don't want "wolf or die" in Cataclysm (and before that it was cat). Each pet family will bring a unique raid buff, allowing hunters to be wildcards for when you are lacking something. The ease of swapping pets will facilitate this further
Yes, I am one of the people that wants "our class" to be taken seriously, and I want all of the specs to competitive with each other (within 2-3% dps of each other) while still maintaining their own abilities that are unique and have a different play style (as much as you can playing a single role class.)...There are BM hunters (like myself) who would prefer that our class was taken seriously and balanced around something other than what are essentially cosmetic differences...
Well, the question is, if each pet gets a focus dump, a special, and then the exotics get another, as that would seem to imply, then that might give the exotics that extra boost. Or the exotic talent might replace the special, and do xx% more damage than a standard pet. Who knows at this point. They probably haven't figured it out yet themselves.Turgus wrote:http://thehuntersrefuge.blogspot.com/20 ... anges.htmlPets -- We haven't done our design pass on them yet. The design is for them to no longer receive raid buff since they get complete scaling from the master (and we don't want them to double dip). Their abilities will be divided into 3 categories: basic focus dumps (e.g. Claw), specials (e.g. web), and exotic abilities for the BM exotic pets. Specials never cost focus and basics have short cooldowns but meaningful damage. All pets will do the same dps. We don't want "wolf or die" in Cataclysm (and before that it was cat). Each pet family will bring a unique raid buff, allowing hunters to be wildcards for when you are lacking something. The ease of swapping pets will facilitate this further
I wasn't able to find the specific blue post, because I remember reading this on the WoW forums.
I know that the post is a bit older, since it does talk about pets getting "complete" scaling.
This is what they (Blizzard) have stated they are planning, now what will actually happen, well.... we will all see.
And I think Blizz should replace that 51 talent point, as well. My point was that leaving out of the "2 schools of thought" debate the BM hunters who don't like Exotics being our 51 is missing a big portion of the posters here.Turgus wrote: My point is this: Until Blizzard replaces the 51 pt talent in BM with something competitive (like duel pets, or a cool ability like Rhumba) don't expect me to go along with the idea of allowing "Just any old hunter" getting the ability that is a 51 pt talent for BM hunters.
And I'm one of those hunters, too, Acherontia. I love BM and hate that my 51-point talent is so...empty. I bring my devilsaur when I raid as BM just because I like my devilsaur. When you come down to it, a raptor or wolf is actually better for me considering my gear. That's just wrong. BM needs much, much more than 4 extra points and some shiny pets.Acherontia wrote:And I think Blizz should replace that 51 talent point, as well. My point was that leaving out of the "2 schools of thought" debate the BM hunters who don't like Exotics being our 51 is missing a big portion of the posters here.Turgus wrote: My point is this: Until Blizzard replaces the 51 pt talent in BM with something competitive (like duel pets, or a cool ability like Rhumba) don't expect me to go along with the idea of allowing "Just any old hunter" getting the ability that is a 51 pt talent for BM hunters.