Page 3 of 3
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 8:43 am
by Magli
I agree that WoW's pauldrons are pretty silly. The Hunter T10 were the worst--my guild leader calls them the "Shoulderpads of No Peripheral Vision." How you can actually *hunt* anything if you can't see what's beside you is beyond me.
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 9:02 am
by Kurenio
Magli wrote:I agree that WoW's pauldrons are pretty silly. The Hunter T10 were the worst--my guild leader calls them the "Shoulderpads of No Peripheral Vision." How you can actually *hunt* anything if you can't see what's beside you is beyond me.
Totally agree only tanks should have pauldrons that size >.>
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 12:53 pm
by Pokerfase
I don't really care for revealing armor. But if revealing armor must exist, it should at least be equal opportunity scantily-cladness. If your male characters have nice physiques, then flaunt them just as much as the females' physiques. It at least averts the sexist implication that women are sexy and should wear as little as possible, but men are ugly and should wear as much as possible. Besides, Warcraft has enough half-naked men to (nearly) compensate for the number of scantily-clad women.
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:01 pm
by Kurenio
Pokerfase wrote:I don't really care for revealing armor. But if revealing armor must exist, it should at least be equal opportunity scantily-cladness. If your male characters have nice physiques, then flaunt them just as much as the females' physiques. It at least averts the sexist implication that women are sexy and should wear as little as possible, but men are ugly and should wear as much as possible. Besides, Warcraft has enough half-naked men to (nearly) compensate for the number of scantily-clad women.
My warrior says hi
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:28 pm
by peanutbuttercup
Pokerfase wrote:I don't really care for revealing armor. But if revealing armor must exist, it should at least be equal opportunity scantily-cladness. If your male characters have nice physiques, then flaunt them just as much as the females' physiques. It at least averts the sexist implication that women are sexy and should wear as little as possible, but men are ugly and should wear as much as possible. Besides, Warcraft has enough half-naked men to (nearly) compensate for the number of scantily-clad women.
It'd be too much to expect it on all armor, but if at least tier sets had dual options for both sexes it would be awesome. It should be equal opportunity for all - cover up your female toon if you want and make your male toon the mailbox dancer.
And I hope this never gets fixed
http://www.wowhead.com/item=54441#screenshots:id=222325
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:37 pm
by Kurenio
peanutbuttercup wrote:
It'd be too much to expect it on all armor, but if at least tier sets had dual options for both sexes it would be awesome. It should be equal opportunity for all - cover up your female toon if you want and make your male toon the mailbox dancer.
And I hope this never gets fixed
http://www.wowhead.com/item=54441#screenshots:id=222325
Um... no comment to that one lol
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 1:40 pm
by AdamSavage
peanutbuttercup wrote:Pokerfase wrote:I don't really care for revealing armor. But if revealing armor must exist, it should at least be equal opportunity scantily-cladness. If your male characters have nice physiques, then flaunt them just as much as the females' physiques. It at least averts the sexist implication that women are sexy and should wear as little as possible, but men are ugly and should wear as much as possible. Besides, Warcraft has enough half-naked men to (nearly) compensate for the number of scantily-clad women.
It'd be too much to expect it on all armor, but if at least tier sets had dual options for both sexes it would be awesome. It should be equal opportunity for all - cover up your female toon if you want and make your male toon the mailbox dancer.
And I hope this never gets fixed
http://www.wowhead.com/item=54441#screenshots:id=222325
He looks more like umm...Never mind..As Kurenio said. No further comment.
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Posted: Mon Jun 06, 2011 5:10 pm
by Ellaran
Pokerfase wrote:I don't really care for revealing armor. But if revealing armor must exist, it should at least be equal opportunity scantily-cladness. If your male characters have nice physiques, then flaunt them just as much as the females' physiques. It at least averts the sexist implication that women are sexy and should wear as little as possible, but men are ugly and should wear as much as possible. Besides, Warcraft has enough half-naked men to (nearly) compensate for the number of scantily-clad women.
Belf warriors in straps and loincloths. Diddily-dee-delicious =3~