WoW Petopia Community

Jadein92 wrote:

Jessibelle wrote:Ah okay. My memory hasn't failed me then. x3

I think she is trying to say you basically repeated an earlier post.

I'm pretty sure she understands that.

•The Hozu are a monkey-like race, they stand up on their legs and can walk around. They play tons of pranks on the local pandarens and are also in a lot of zones.
•The Alliance will try to become friend with the Hozu, and the Horde with the Jinyu (fish people) and will try to turn them against each other. (factions)

Although I feel that Dr. Rockso may be trolling, he might indirectly have a point. With the new Tiger and Crane models, it's pretty likely that we might be seeing a new tameable primate model of some sort in the next few months. Possibly inspired from a baboon or orangutan or macaque or whatever monkeys live in China these days...

...And I shall name him KungPoo...

Royi wrote:Azu is that from Conkers?

Got me. I stole it from Google. It's the Geico money-thing that stares at people.

Azunara wrote:

Royi wrote:Azu is that from Conkers?

Got me. I stole it from Google. It's the Geico money-thing that stares at people.

This is what I was thinking of Hah! Conker's Bad Fur Day. Eyes are positioned differently

That would be a different skin of the same beast type, yes?

Slapperfish wrote:

•The Hozu are a monkey-like race, they stand up on their legs and can walk around. They play tons of pranks on the local pandarens and are also in a lot of zones.
•The Alliance will try to become friend with the Hozu, and the Horde with the Jinyu (fish people) and will try to turn them against each other. (factions)

Although I feel that Dr. Rockso may be trolling, he might indirectly have a point. With the new Tiger and Crane models, it's pretty likely that we might be seeing a new tameable primate model of some sort in the next few months. Possibly inspired from a baboon or orangutan or macaque or whatever monkeys live in China these days...

...And I shall name him KungPoo...

i dont see how thinking that this might be a possible taming skin is trolling but to each his own i guess

Dr. Rockso wrote:

Slapperfish wrote:

•The Hozu are a monkey-like race, they stand up on their legs and can walk around. They play tons of pranks on the local pandarens and are also in a lot of zones.
•The Alliance will try to become friend with the Hozu, and the Horde with the Jinyu (fish people) and will try to turn them against each other. (factions)

Although I feel that Dr. Rockso may be trolling, he might indirectly have a point. With the new Tiger and Crane models, it's pretty likely that we might be seeing a new tameable primate model of some sort in the next few months. Possibly inspired from a baboon or orangutan or macaque or whatever monkeys live in China these days...

...And I shall name him KungPoo...

i dont see how thinking that this might be a possible taming skin is trolling but to each his own i guess

I think it's more the fact Blizzard outright said this wasnt a pet or a beast. It's a HUMANOID, therefore not a chance of it being tameable.

they have also said nothing is by far set in stone and stranger things have happened with taming pets

Tamable gnomes.

Do want.

If we're taming humanoids here, I want a gorloc.

I don't believe for a second that these monkeys will be tameable, but I would like to see tameable pandas - not like the ones that will be playable but actual pandas (i.e a recolour of the in game bear model would suffice).

Lycanthea wrote:I don't believe for a second that these monkeys will be tameable, but I would like to see tameable pandas - not like the ones that will be playable but actual pandas (i.e a recolour of the in game bear model would suffice).

Those would be cool.

Dr. Rockso wrote:they have also said nothing is by far set in stone and stranger things have happened with taming pets

Using this logic, why can't I tame Deathwing? Nothing is set in stone, he could end up becoming Fairy Queen, a beast, and completely tamable, and after all, stranger things have been tamed.

Do you understand where I am going? Just because they haven't said no and we've had weirder pets that were USUALLY bugs (Name me one "odd" pet that is legit.) doesn't mean we can tame it.

Okay, now back to the bad jokes.

in fact for the first 5 months on this forum, I thought Azu was Saturo's tamed pet.

Ok Chromagnus

i remember when Chromagus came out and people said oh you will never be able to tame him cause hes a dragonkin and you cant tame a dragonkin


and i would like to put this in there

pos·si·ble
adjective
1. that may or can be, exist, happen, be done, be used.
2.that may be true or may be the case.

do you understand where I'm going with that?

Way too much attitude in both directions in this thread...

Tamable gnomes = attitude?

/confused

Not you, Worba.

Dr. Rockso wrote:Ok Chromagnus

i remember when Chromagus came out and people said oh you will never be able to tame him cause hes a dragonkin and you cant tame a dragonkin


and i would like to put this in there

pos·si·ble
adjective
1. that may or can be, exist, happen, be done, be used.
2.that may be true or may be the case.

do you understand where I'm going with that?

I'll try not to make this as aggressive, Kalli was right, I probably was a bit snippy.

Very well, I will grant you Chromagus. I would like to point out that is the exception, not the rule. That is one of maybe two or three pets that Blizz have gone back on. That's of a few of a hundred or so pets, which are of there part of hundreds of creatures. Blizzard can say it is possible they will add perma-death, but that doesn't mean they will. They can say it is possible they will shut down WoW, doesn't mean it's true. I can say it is possible I will get diabetes (My mom has had it for years and I am gentically more likely to suffer from it) doesn't mean I will.

When you use 'possibility' as the basis of your argument, it makes the argument rather weak, because you're going off a chance. A maybe. There is nothing finite and sure about your arguments or points, you're just saying, "Well, this happened once, it could happen again." There comes a time where possibility just can't win the argument, and this is one of those times.

Indeed, Azu. Just because there's a monkey-like race being added to the NPC races, it doesn't mean that we're going to see a new monkey skin out of it. The charhounds were a new dog-like model, but we weren't allowed to tame them, despite NPC hunters being allowed to do so.

Just because you really want something to be true, Rockso, or don't want to be wrong, doesn't make your arguments logical or likely. Anything is possible, but not everything is likely. It doesn't mean that you are necessarily going to be wrong in the long run, but there's no concrete support for your theories at this present time.