Page 3 of 3
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 4:26 pm
by cowmuflage
Vulpixen wrote:And that moonkin I posted(I believe) looks enough like an actual moonkin. I said remove the breasts but give her a slightly smaller frame. That way you can tell the gender difference if only slightly, moonkin are humanoid in nature not beastial like the cats/bears and most all humanoids that exist in WoW have a male and a female concept(even if they dont look like they're from the same species).Pandaren females are slightly smaller than the males but you can still tell they're the same species. The face is perfect its an owl and moonkin are OWL beasts not parrot beasts as WoW would have us believe. I'm sorry if you think its a "furry" but essentially as a moonkin anyone could be considered a furry while running around in a moonkin costume. The current models are awful, slapping armor on them? Awful.
I'm sorry but I don't think it's face is perfect at all. Infact I find it rather ugly. XD And it's hands those look bad too. Theres alot of things wrong with that drawing atleast in my eyes. That's just my personal opinion.
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 6:12 pm
by Galaxy
Guys, ya'll are missing the best part: /dance !!!!
Think about it..with THAT armor.... thrusting like mad.... *giggle*
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 6:40 pm
by Rubywashere
I dear heck....
Is this what their calling a new model form moonkin? ive been wanting a new form forever, Im not found of saggy butts or strety feet thanks.
I mean the trents and the cats got an upgrade alreadly. I think its about time Moonkins got upgrades as well, and not just slapping some tacky Armour on it
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 7:18 pm
by Wassa
I love the current moonkin form. Sure it's outdated, but they are just so goofy looking and big and fluffy and I just want to hug them forever.
I like the idea of armor on moonkin but this isn't the type of armor that's right for one. Claws mittens on their arms-err... wings. Crotch plates? *laughs* Really Blizzard? They look like a catcher at a baseball game.
I want more caster type armor. Just a cloth robe and some shoulder and helm armor is fine. Something like the Arakkoa mages have.
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 7:19 pm
by cowmuflage
Galaxy wrote:Guys, ya'll are missing the best part: /dance !!!!
Think about it..with THAT armor.... thrusting like mad.... *giggle*
Dear god how could I forget that!
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 10:50 pm
by Kalliope
Obviously not working as intended, but still.
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 10:59 pm
by cowmuflage
haha
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 11:15 pm
by Vephriel
It looks like someone toilet papered it...
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Fri May 18, 2012 11:47 pm
by Kalliope
All I could think was "What's the flap on the back for?"
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 12:05 am
by cowmuflage
Kalliope wrote:All I could think was "What's the flap on the back for?"
Its a loo seat. So that you don't get a messy bottom when you go loo in the wild.
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 12:13 pm
by Ellaran
Kalliope wrote:
Obviously not working as intended, but still.
"All right, who put bleach in the washing machine?"
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 3:54 pm
by Zuilu
Oh my...eugh. Really?
Wassa and Veph summed it up nicely for me..grats to those who like it, but for those who dislike it, like me...hopefully the glyph overwrites this mess >.>
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 4:00 pm
by Wassa
Wait... so not only do armored moonkins have crotch plates but Blizzard gave them butt plates too?
*facepalm*
WTB model editing my moonkin to an Arakkoa again. I suddenly miss it a ton.
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 6:06 pm
by Rhyela
Bleh. I prefer them without armor of any type, but if they must have some, then I'm with Wassa. A mage-esque getup would suit them much better IMO.
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 6:08 pm
by cowmuflage
I'll stick to my naked moonkin. Whoo nature!
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 7:21 pm
by Mozag
Yuck! My poor Lorellin will look even more undignified now.
Not only did the Cataclysm mechanics make it far less enjoyable for me to play a boomkin, but this atrocity will probably make me stop altogether. Please let there be a glyph that hides this disgusting thing somehow!
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sat May 19, 2012 8:06 pm
by Ellaran
Mozag wrote:Yuck! My poor Lorellin will look even more undignified now.
Not only did the Cataclysm mechanics make it far less enjoyable for me to play a boomkin, but this atrocity will probably make me stop altogether. Please let there be a glyph that hides this disgusting thing somehow!
There is, you take on an astral form, ghostly and misty with moonlight.
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 2:56 am
by Mozag
Ellaran wrote:Mozag wrote:Yuck! My poor Lorellin will look even more undignified now.
Not only did the Cataclysm mechanics make it far less enjoyable for me to play a boomkin, but this atrocity will probably make me stop altogether. Please let there be a glyph that hides this disgusting thing somehow!
There is, you take on an astral form, ghostly and misty with moonlight.
I am so glad. You have made my day!
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 3:03 am
by Kalliope
Mozag wrote:Ellaran wrote:Mozag wrote:Yuck! My poor Lorellin will look even more undignified now.
Not only did the Cataclysm mechanics make it far less enjoyable for me to play a boomkin, but this atrocity will probably make me stop altogether. Please let there be a glyph that hides this disgusting thing somehow!
There is, you take on an astral form, ghostly and misty with moonlight.
I am so glad. You have made my day!
I saw an owl using that glyph, but when whichever talent that procs the animal-in-ugly-armor look still showed it. :/
Re: Moonkin Armored Form
Posted: Sun May 20, 2012 4:43 am
by Mozag
Kalliope wrote:
I saw an owl using that glyph, but when whichever talent that procs the animal-in-ugly-armor look still showed it. :/
Not good. Well, let's hope it won't be a talent we'll be forced to take. I thought the armoured cat forms were bad...I was wrong.
