Re: In-Game Cinematics
Posted: Thu Sep 25, 2014 2:32 am
Yeah I've had for a long time had the stance of "if it was that important they'd put it in the game somehow".
A fun place to chat about hunter pets in the World of Warcraft.
https://forums.wow-petopia.com/
I think thats true for the most part. Although after I read "The Shattering" I felt like I wouldn't know anything about the paladin - tauren relationship or the dwarf kings without reading it. There's probably a quest somewhere that explains it but at the time I remember thinking "gee how would you know this without that book?!".cowmuflage wrote:Yeah I've had for a long time had the stance of "if it was that important they'd put it in the game somehow".
This. After that line, Maraad tells him a story on the loyalty of one clan. But I swear Varian was not convinced that orcs are anything less than monsters.LupisDarkmoon wrote: (On the genocide thing, Tyrande is a little scary. Though I'm getting pretty wary around Varian ever since the Lords of War episode where... Okay, so Maraad has just told him about warlords that fought impossible odds to save their people from the ogres, who have enslaved, tortured, and killed them in droves. He's even told Varian about the one that was a pit fighter. Ring any bells, Varian? Noooo, apparently not, because "So they're all monsters" is a thing he actually says. He apparently has no ability to see the warlords as anything but mindless killing machines despite having these heartstring pulling stories told to him.)
No, I'm just laughing because you said if you take in someone as Warchief and they screw up, you're responsible for their actions. Like Zaela and Garrosh...or Garrosh and Thrall. He may not have laid the charges, but by your argument he's still responsible. (I'm mostly teasing you now, don't worry about it. I'm being silly.)Junrei wrote:I don't think Thrall was in charge of those charges. It never says who decided them.Azunara wrote:And yet people say Thrall is innocent and Garrosh chose his own path.Junrei wrote:I know, I thought it was a little overboard but it seems if you take Warchief and take someone under your wing that screwed up royally, you're responsible for them.
Thrall made his errors but Garrosh did choose his own path too. Neither are innocent...only one decided to correct it.
The books are very much canon. Rhonin is dead Valleria makes reference during the isle of thunder opening quest chain as well as few other points during the isle of thunder. Saying the horde will pay for taking her husband from her. "death"Kenna wrote:I don't accept the books as canon at all. To be honest that's the stupidest logic that Blizz has going for them. If it's canon have it in game or not at all. Case in point. Remember that guy Rhonin? Leader of the Kirin Tor and all the jazz. Last I checked he was still alive in game but according to book lore he's dead. So yeah... I don't believe a word of lore from the new books.
*remembers Krasus/Korialstraz*LupisDarkmoon wrote:I really wish they'd work more on making the world react to what happens in the books. Important things happen in the books that go completely ignored in the game world, because they never update anything! I don't even remember how long it took for Theramore to be the smoking wreckage it's supposed to- ...wait, is it even gone yet?
That's the thing. The books make these huge sweeping changes and then the game can't follow through with them. Theramore's a quest area, so they can't really destroy that. Rhonin has quest text so can't really kill him easily. Korialistrasz, too, has important text and he needs to be around even though he's dead.
Just- come on. If you're going to have all those important lore bits happen, make them happen in the game that people came to play, not the books that only a few people bother reading. Otherwise a whole lot of people are not going to have any idea what's happening in lore- and that's not their fault, because unless you're a fan of that style of book, reading the books is agony.
And you can claim to believe that canon but that doesn't mean I have to accept it. Anytime you have to go to outside sources for lore in a game you play, the business is doing it wrong AND it's not like they can't change it. They have the money. And as Lupis said thats the problem with making sweeping changes in, what is in my opinion, very poorly written books. So you keep your opinion and I'll keep mine.SetsunaChan wrote:The books are very much canon. Rhonin is dead Valleria makes reference during the isle of thunder opening quest chain as well as few other points during the isle of thunder. Saying the horde will pay for taking her husband from her. "death"Kenna wrote:I don't accept the books as canon at all. To be honest that's the stupidest logic that Blizz has going for them. If it's canon have it in game or not at all. Case in point. Remember that guy Rhonin? Leader of the Kirin Tor and all the jazz. Last I checked he was still alive in game but according to book lore he's dead. So yeah... I don't believe a word of lore from the new books.
Reason Rhonin is still "alive" in Dalaran is because blizzard would have to add in a new npc in Rhonins place and have to do new dialogue as well as voice recordings. "Ulduar stuff"
Read our first page or two of discussion because nope, that's not really what we're trying to say! General consensus is, overall, "Garrosh messed up bigtime but Thrall is to blame too". Which is why some of us were so angry- Thrall gets to walk away from this guilt free. Which is BS. Garrosh definitely takes a good amount of blame, but that Thrall got to say "no it's ALL YOUR FAULT" goes against... heck, an entire book worth of lore.Slickrock wrote:Just wow...
Just because Garry had daddy issues and greenJesus jealousy, we are supposed to excuse all he did?