Page 1 of 1
Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 1:22 am
by MaximumOverdrive
http://www.mmo-champion.com/content/280 ... -the-Month
Pretty cool...not sure if all armor is showing tho, as worgen bear forms don't have the claws, and troll cat forms don't have the back armor. Could be on purpose tho. Horde armor has more details on it than Ally armor it seems.
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:53 am
by Ziarre
I think the trolls not having the back armor is on purpose, because what the heck would they do with the mohawks otherwise? I have to say though, the armor's come a long way. I kinda like it now!
Edit: Come to think of it, the worgen bears have some pretty fearsome claws by default. That would be slapping on some seriously unneccessary weaponry to some already substantial weapons. *hadn't noticed just how long the worgen bear form's claws were*
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:55 am
by Zuilu
I actually think the bear armor looks pretty wicked. Cats I'm on the fence about, but it's not too bad. Moonkins though..what a mess. XD
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 3:57 am
by Ziarre
Hah, I'm pretty sure the moonkin'll be a mess until they put it on a properly updated model. No telling when that'll happen though, as Glyph of Stars is supposed to be our alternative in the meantime.
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:02 am
by Chimera
Im still seriously weirded out by the wodden jockstrap the moonkins have..
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:09 am
by Ziarre
Better than realizing feral forms are essentially people running around with no clothes on. 8'D
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:12 am
by Chimera
xD I prefer them more cause we dont see them nekkid as humanoids and animals dont dress themselves in clothes so they are allowed to be 'nekkid'

Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:16 am
by cowmuflage
I'm so not going to use any of those XD they alll look pretty meh.
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 4:25 am
by Ziarre
I don't buy the 'but they're animals' when it's just a humanoid in animal form. xP Granted, it doesn't usually bother me, but it strikes me as just as silly to complain about moonkin armor suggesting things by covering them up.
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 5:56 am
by Rawr
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 10:30 am
by Kalliope
Rawr wrote:Does this make me look fat?

Does my face get mauled if I say yes?

Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Mon Jun 11, 2012 11:22 am
by Wassa
Bear form is the only one that needs armor.
Th other forms, no. Just no.
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Wed Jun 13, 2012 1:06 pm
by Rower
At least troll bears don't look so horrible with the armor on...
Re: Armored druid forms
Posted: Thu Jun 14, 2012 1:06 pm
by Bulletdance
Now my main's armor will have more polygons than he does. Sigh, slapping outdated gear on beautiful animal models isn't exactly something I'm excited for. If the gear were to match what my char was wearing normally then I'd be all for it,but I'll be grumpy no matter what they do until my lovely moonkin gets a proper update.