WoW Petopia Community

Who will be rolling them?

I will ! it looks too awesome...undead...soooo going to race change

Been looking forward to one since I started playing WoW. I'll be rolling a female undead named Spiders (have the name reserved already ^^), and her stable will house one from each model of the Spider family.

You bet!

*has an excuse to make a new hunter.*

if i ever start playing again ill probably race change my troll to an undead...

undead hunter... never..

An undead hunter with a diseased wolf or bear. that would kick ass. :3 Defiantly will be rolling one!!

I think both undead and HUman hunters are stupid mostly undead... if a walking pile of bones can tame a wolf then they need to make gnome hunters!

Well now the stuipid thing is that the undead and humans have all the same classes yes the undead can not be pallys. I mean it makes sence that the forsaken can get all the human classes as well they ARE human and all but why no pallys? they bend the light to make priests :S

cowmuflage wrote:I mean it makes sence that the forsaken can get all the human classes as well they ARE human and all

On that topic, given Sylvanas' cataclysm shenanigans, shouldn't we be getting some undead gnome models?

</raises hand and waves it excitedly in the air>

Me too! Got her name reserved and several of her pets and their names planned out too!

It's all about the "evil" pets baby - because after all, a girl can't be good all the time

cowmuflage wrote:Well now the stuipid thing is that the undead and humans have all the same classes yes the undead can not be pallys. I mean it makes sence that the forsaken can get all the human classes as well they ARE human and all but why no pallys? they bend the light to make priests :S

Getting healed and being healed while undead in a holy / disc spec hurts the undead. Even Blizzard has stated so, it takes very much of them to fulfill the spells, being a Paladin would make you having to go trough all this pain -every- time you do something.

Afterall Paladins were immune to the plague, and couldn't be infected, and captured by Arthas.


Something similar to this, read it up on WowWiki or something I am actually not so sure about this, but it is what I've heard and read

Yes but Quelthasa blizz has screwd up there own lore before and they could just simple give them pallys it would not change the game. I mean its like leting male nigth elfs be warriors when only females can be in lore.

I doubt I will. I just don't click with the undead. Still, a dead hunter with dead pets (or yes, spiders, Veph) is a rather fun idea. Or bats...just for the cliche. But, I don't click with the dead pets, either. Now, if the mummy eagles and bone raptors were tameable, though...

I am surprised that Mania hasn't commented on the undead hunter, I thought I red somewhere that thats what she really wanted to be...could be wrong.

I love the thought of an undead hunter myself, will probably roll one on nessinwary Diseased wolf and bear as main pets XD

I think Mania's been horribly busy as of late, but I'm sure she would comment if she had the time/had seen the thread.

Mania recently got a new job, so she'll be preoccupied for a bit.

As cool as I think the idea is, I just can't seem to wrap my mind around any live animal following an undead creature.

Dewclaw wrote:As cool as I think the idea is, I just can't seem to wrap my mind around any live animal following an undead creature.

If Tame Beast can make a Devilsaur not eat us, pull birds from their nests (and the raptors for that matter) that very well might have eggs or chicks, pull pack animals from their packs and make our animals not attack other creatures we don't tell them to attack...

I have less of an issue with Undead Hunters personally.