Page 1 of 3
More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:16 pm
by Saturo
Just wondering if it would be possible to add more high ranks? Or shift a few low ones around. The forum has been up for a while now, and I feel like there's no longer any goal for me to reach.
And no, I won't stop trolling. I just want to be a "Gnomish stalker". Then Ryno could be a "Gnomish Stalker stalker". Please? With sugar on the top please?
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:40 pm
by Mania
Suggestions?
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:42 pm
by Saturo
Wow... I didn't expect any response...
Well, since Cata will most likely have a Elemental/Druid/Shaman theme, Wind Stalker, Fire Stalker, Water stalker (exciting!), Bear stalker, Totemstalker.
And Gnomish Stalker.
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:43 pm
by Chrizesu
How about "social butterfly"? j/k
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:47 pm
by Zangor
maybe start adding more of the title based ranks like conquerer or astral walker they sound cool and are worth acheiveing 
i personally want to be twilight vanquisher
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:50 pm
by Vephriel
Hmm, truthfully I don't see the point in continually adding more and more titles/ranks. What we have now seems very encompassing.
After all, we're here to discuss matters around the pet and hunter community amongst other things, post count shouldn't really become its own entity.
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:53 pm
by Saturo
I like Zangor's idea too. But don't forget Gnomish Stalker!
Shoo, Veph! Shoo! Too cowardous to have more titles, are ye?
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:55 pm
by Zangor
shes just upset cuz to use any of these shed need to take off that stable master title 
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:57 pm
by Saturo
Zangor wrote:shes just upset cuz to use any of these shed need to take off that stable master title 
*Glares at Vephriel.*
You meanie!
And dualwielding titles would be cool. And unneccessary. But still cool.
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:57 pm
by Vephriel
Mm, no not really.

I just don't see the logic in adding more than we really need.
/2cents
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:00 pm
by Nikrosnil
Honestly, It doesn't make sense to add more ranks. I mean, what's the point? If the only reason to post is for the titles, it negates the reason these forums exist. I have nothing against getting more ranks, just don't think it makes sense.
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:02 pm
by Saturo
Hush! You shall not stop me from my epic title!
It shall be mine!
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:02 pm
by Zangor
considering that hunter trainers are special ranks why not add others or let users who have proven themselves get a custom rank?
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:03 pm
by Vephriel
A Hunter Trainer is a user who has proven themselves though. I don't think there needs to be various types of those ranks, as that's just confusing and some may feel that others are 'higher' than them.
In the end it's just more work for Mania which, ultimately, doesn't have much of a purpose. We're good with what we've got. ^^
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:06 pm
by Nikrosnil
Vephriel wrote:A Hunter Trainer is a user who has proven themselves though. I don't think there needs to be various types of those ranks, as that's just confusing and some may feel that others are 'higher' than them.
In the end it's just more work for Mania which, ultimately, doesn't have much of a purpose. We're good with what we've got. ^^
I second that. ^^
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:06 pm
by Saturo
Aye, the way I see it, hunter trainers could be split into several categories. The sigmakers, the guild leaders and the experienced and helpful people.
And having some sort of "yay I have a special rank but not a special colour for my rank" names could be fun. Like Gnomish Stalker. I want that one badly!

Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:11 pm
by Zangor
your a determined little gnome arent you saturo?
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:14 pm
by rubybeam
silly spamming susage we need now.
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 7:15 pm
by Saturo
Aye, I can be quite a pain when I want to. Basically, all I want is some titles for 1.5k, 2k and maybe even 5k.
And Gnomish Stalker.
Re: More ranks? Please please with sugar on the top please!
Posted: Thu Feb 11, 2010 8:07 pm
by Golden
Nikkrosnil wrote:Vephriel wrote:A Hunter Trainer is a user who has proven themselves though. I don't think there needs to be various types of those ranks, as that's just confusing and some may feel that others are 'higher' than them.
In the end it's just more work for Mania which, ultimately, doesn't have much of a purpose. We're good with what we've got. ^^
I second that. ^^
Thirded. Plus I don't really see why there would be moar titles for a single person. Maybe make it so that once you have... 3k posts you will be able to make your own title? That way Saturo will get to be a Gnomish Stalker and Mania doesn't have to make up more titles to please the little spammer. :P
Dragon Cave's forum has it in use, write 2k posts and you can have whatever you like as your title.