"Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Unread post by **Kikanu** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 3:47 pm

@Gammaman: Lich King didn't like to move right. He also showed as big as a raid boss, which was cumbersome.

@erwil: They drop the change mid-combat. Wouldn't be much to show. Only a few models work in combat for some reason.

**My Characters** · Unread post by **Kurenio** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 3:57 pm

I now want a humanoid pet >.>

Unread post by **Kikanu** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 4:38 pm

Kurenio wrote:I now want a humanoid pet >.>

If an update comes out for the program I use that allows pets to stay in form, I'll do some demo fights of them just to add to your hunger.

Unread post by **Cerele** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:03 pm

Kurenio wrote:I now want a humanoid pet >.>

way way way back in the vanilla days, when BC was a rumor in the early beta, the now humaniod Shale Flayers were tameable. they were beasts back then, but it was very brief i dont get why they arent. theyd make perfect ferocity pets with 4% physical damage increase and an AoE.

If you are an engineer and go into stone core, you can MC belt the ones in there and make them use the flay ability they have... ohh my god i get so much damage in the 30 seconds i have him

**My Characters** · Unread post by **Kurenio** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:05 pm

I only had my orihime back then, so I wouldn't know of the secrets of classic :O all I needed was my kitty.

Unread post by **Cerele** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:16 pm

yea i just had spaz.... and my empty stable slots to learn her some abilities

Unread post by **Gammaman** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:30 pm

ohhh Do.. Do... BARON RIVERDARE

Unread post by **Litlemouse** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 5:42 pm

How do you do this?! *Leaves to Google and then come back*

Unread post by **pop** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 6:43 pm

omg I want them now

lol and humanoid npcs are just lol

Unread post by **pop** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 6:44 pm

Kurenio wrote:I now want a humanoid pet >.>

I once tamed a worgen..

twas awesome

Unread post by **Tsuki** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 7:32 pm

Do some hawkstriders!
At least the swift purple, and sunreaver ones

Unread post by **Acherontia** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:38 pm

I wish it wasn't an account risk... I'd be extremely tempted to model edit something into a black drake.

Thank you for showing us these!

I am now hoping that, one day, stags become pets O.o It looked surprisingly good!

Unread post by **Grokan** » Mon Jul 04, 2011 11:44 pm

Some very nice work! Only some of the pets look a bit too big for my taste (dragons and the firehawk, for example).

Acherontia wrote:I wish it wasn't an account risk... I'd be extremely tempted to model edit something into a black drake.

Thank you for showing us these!

I am now hoping that, one day, stags become pets O.o It looked surprisingly good!

Aye, if it was legal I would turn my wolf into a Hydra.

Unread post by **Silivren** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 12:31 am

Please please please do all the talbuks! <3 They would make my WHOLE DAY!! And I'd totally come back to WoW for a talbuk pet!!

Unread post by **Litlemouse** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 1:25 am

It's illegal? >.> oh

Unread post by **pop** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 2:40 am

do druid bear, druid cat, druid bird and druid tree and druid bat pls

i wanna tame druid

and turtle

and sea snake

and fish like frenzy and shark

ooo oo and whale shark

and orcas

and jelly fish

YES JELLYFISH

Unread post by **Moderator** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:04 am

Be aware that Blizzard has stated that editing your WoW data files this way is unacceptable to them and they may take action against your account.

In other words, you could be banned.

While I check with Mania on how she wants to handle this thread, please keep the topic focused on the pictures (as you have been) and skip the detailed instructions of model editing. Thanks.

Unread post by **erwil** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 5:10 am

I remember a discussion from while back considering this subject. Model editing is a bit of a slippery slope, but as long as it's a cosmetic change and not something game breaking, I don't think you can get banned for it.

Unread post by **Akyo** » Tue Jul 05, 2011 7:30 am

isent there a unwritten rule thats something like this: if only you can see it and it doesnt give you anny game advantages then its just good fun?
Before druids got their new forms there was a mod around that would change your druidforms. your cat form could be a worgen if you so wanted. Of course only the player itself would see these other models.
And isent there a player somewhere on these forums that was horde but used a gnome model?
It should be pretty safe if only you can see it. But for safety one shouldt go around telling people about it.
Just incase some reported you for editing the game.

But could you be so kind to show how a mana wurm, a marsh walker and a Mana serpent? :3 Oh and a shark! <3 one of the Treshers would be perfect.

My Dragon Cave · Tue Jul 05, 2011 8:50 am

http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/topic/2228415190

For those questioning whether or not this was ever made a grey area, here's a blizz response from this year. So there's the answer.

Although, I am interested in seeing the mana wurm... They'd make some pretty cool pets, I bet.

WoW Petopia Community

"Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?

Re: "Gee, that would be a wicked pet!"...or would it?