So today reading the general forums...
Re: So today reading the general forums...
-
- Grand Master Hunter
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:23 am
- Realm: Ner'zhul
- Gender: Male
- Location: In a raid
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Totally agree only tanks should have pauldrons that size >.>Magli wrote:I agree that WoW's pauldrons are pretty silly. The Hunter T10 were the worst--my guild leader calls them the "Shoulderpads of No Peripheral Vision." How you can actually *hunt* anything if you can't see what's beside you is beyond me.
My Characters
Signatures thanks to the amazing Sookie,Kuraine,
Rongar, Serenith and Me!
"Follow my heart, Follow my head, I'll follow anything to get to her heart."
12 hunters and 10 other classes being leveled.
- Pokerfase
- Journeyman Hunter
- Posts: 135
- Joined: Sun Sep 12, 2010 5:58 pm
- Realm: Vek'nilash, Area 52
- Gender: Male
Re: So today reading the general forums...
-
- Grand Master Hunter
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:23 am
- Realm: Ner'zhul
- Gender: Male
- Location: In a raid
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Pokerfase wrote:I don't really care for revealing armor. But if revealing armor must exist, it should at least be equal opportunity scantily-cladness. If your male characters have nice physiques, then flaunt them just as much as the females' physiques. It at least averts the sexist implication that women are sexy and should wear as little as possible, but men are ugly and should wear as much as possible. Besides, Warcraft has enough half-naked men to (nearly) compensate for the number of scantily-clad women.
My warrior says hi
My Characters
Signatures thanks to the amazing Sookie,Kuraine,
Rongar, Serenith and Me!
"Follow my heart, Follow my head, I'll follow anything to get to her heart."
12 hunters and 10 other classes being leveled.
- peanutbuttercup
- Artisan Hunter
- Posts: 929
- Joined: Thu Nov 18, 2010 12:52 am
Re: So today reading the general forums...
It'd be too much to expect it on all armor, but if at least tier sets had dual options for both sexes it would be awesome. It should be equal opportunity for all - cover up your female toon if you want and make your male toon the mailbox dancer.Pokerfase wrote:I don't really care for revealing armor. But if revealing armor must exist, it should at least be equal opportunity scantily-cladness. If your male characters have nice physiques, then flaunt them just as much as the females' physiques. It at least averts the sexist implication that women are sexy and should wear as little as possible, but men are ugly and should wear as much as possible. Besides, Warcraft has enough half-naked men to (nearly) compensate for the number of scantily-clad women.

And I hope this never gets fixed http://www.wowhead.com/item=54441#screenshots:id=222325
-
- Grand Master Hunter
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2011 2:23 am
- Realm: Ner'zhul
- Gender: Male
- Location: In a raid
Re: So today reading the general forums...
Um... no comment to that one lolpeanutbuttercup wrote:
It'd be too much to expect it on all armor, but if at least tier sets had dual options for both sexes it would be awesome. It should be equal opportunity for all - cover up your female toon if you want and make your male toon the mailbox dancer.![]()
And I hope this never gets fixed http://www.wowhead.com/item=54441#screenshots:id=222325
My Characters
Signatures thanks to the amazing Sookie,Kuraine,
Rongar, Serenith and Me!
"Follow my heart, Follow my head, I'll follow anything to get to her heart."
12 hunters and 10 other classes being leveled.
- AdamSavage
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 4487
- Joined: Sat Mar 12, 2011 10:42 pm
- Gender: Male
Re: So today reading the general forums...
He looks more like umm...Never mind..As Kurenio said. No further comment.peanutbuttercup wrote:It'd be too much to expect it on all armor, but if at least tier sets had dual options for both sexes it would be awesome. It should be equal opportunity for all - cover up your female toon if you want and make your male toon the mailbox dancer.Pokerfase wrote:I don't really care for revealing armor. But if revealing armor must exist, it should at least be equal opportunity scantily-cladness. If your male characters have nice physiques, then flaunt them just as much as the females' physiques. It at least averts the sexist implication that women are sexy and should wear as little as possible, but men are ugly and should wear as much as possible. Besides, Warcraft has enough half-naked men to (nearly) compensate for the number of scantily-clad women.![]()
And I hope this never gets fixed http://www.wowhead.com/item=54441#screenshots:id=222325
I believe if you can believe out of nothing an explosion (big bang) happened then how far fetched can god be?

Re: So today reading the general forums...
Belf warriors in straps and loincloths. Diddily-dee-delicious =3~Pokerfase wrote:I don't really care for revealing armor. But if revealing armor must exist, it should at least be equal opportunity scantily-cladness. If your male characters have nice physiques, then flaunt them just as much as the females' physiques. It at least averts the sexist implication that women are sexy and should wear as little as possible, but men are ugly and should wear as much as possible. Besides, Warcraft has enough half-naked men to (nearly) compensate for the number of scantily-clad women.