Taluwen: No doubt
Nothing wrong with that !
TygerDarkstorm wrote:By no means does the female worgen scream "savage" or "vicious" (to me anyway). She just looks sort of strange and unproportional. Overall I dislike the fact that all our worgen have to have "snarling faces anyway." We're supposed to be portraying creatures that are in control of their curse. When they go in combat they can snarl, and I would probably give my worgen warrior and DK snarl-like faces, but I'd rather my caster worgen to look cold and calculating. Just my two cents.
Well, thats kinda the problem I have with the model. It doesn't look savage enough. The females don't look dangerous enough. I watched someone stream the entire worgen questline, from character creation to taking the boat to Teldrassil. In that entire time, all the worgen I saw were the male kind. Feral looking. Fierce. Like they's rip your throat out for looking at them the wrong way, even the ones who are "in control." Granted, its been a while since I watched the vid. They could have added female models into the questing areas since then. But my point stands. The model doesn't look scary or intimidating. It looks cuddly. I want to wolf whistle at it )oh, the irony, lol). I don't get that "She's gonna rip out my throat with those claws," feeling from it. The male model invokes that feeling quite well.
And thats another thing. If the Worgen are truly in control of their curse, why does the excitement of battle cause them to shift to their worgen form involuntarily ? To me that indicates that they're not as much in control as they'd like others (and themselves for that matter ?) to think
Ultimately (from my PoV), the Worgen form is supposed to be a hybrid of human and wolf. The male form presents that quite well. I just don't feel the current female one does. To me, if I want my female worgen to look sexy, she's got her human form. When she's in her worgen form, I want her to look like she's ready to kick some horde tail
It's fantastic if she still looks feminine, but I want her to look dangerous as well. That's my opinion, and I know there's some here who disagree with that. I really do enjoy reading everyones thoughts, because they bring up really good points that I don't think of, giving me more to think about ! And thats pretty cool imho
Opinions are like air. We're all entitled to some, and free to share it with others, heh. This is just mine. I'm expressing it because I'm really excited to see what Blizzard will eventually come up with, and I want them to do the very best that they can.
As I said, I wish I could find my Werewolf source book. Then I could scan in some pics of what I think are good female werewolf forms, and get your opinions on them.
Ket Shi wrote:Is there any source on the comment that female worgen are getting yet another revision?
Thanks for asking ! It gave me a great excuse to go back and watch some of the WoW panels. It was a side comment made by one of the devs at the World of Warcraft: Art Panel. Just under 34 minutes into the Art panel, Chris Robinson, the art director, stated: "I should also mention in [Thomas] Blue's presentation, we don't show the worgen female, because we recently put some more work into it, and its not at a point where we're ready to show it yet, so thats why it was not in his presentation. In case anyone was wondering."
Now, I freely admit that I could have misinterpreted his statement, and he could have been talking about the model changes made on the 17th. However, those changes were made before BlizzCon and are public. Chris said that they weren't ready to show of the changes to the female model, which seems to indicate that there are more changes in the pipe for it, at least by my interpretation. Since I'm not on the Dev team, I'm not privy to the latest info, so obviously my assumption could be wrong
But yea, thats what I based my statement on more changes for the female model off of.