Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Forum rules
Be respectful of others or else. Read the details.
User avatar
Kalliope
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 14063
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
Realm: Dethecus
Location: Thedas
Contact:

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Kalliope »

Delightful is indeed a word! :lol:

And you know what they say about assumptions! :D

Image
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!

Slickrock
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 8:20 pm

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Slickrock »

Kalliope wrote:
The originally quoted post isn't based on facts, it's just more QQ.

Your nameplate doesn't show.

See, look here. AND flare doesn't work on camo.
Hi! I'm your resident QQer who should just shutup but I can't help myself.

Regarding the whole nameplate and targeting thing, I would like to see if the camo'd hunter shows up via tab-targeting.

Also, since you can target the hunter that's in camo by clicking on him, assuming you know where he is or just get lucky, we are still subject to the rogue/warrior melee attacks. So we did get nerfed here. People seem to be thinking this is rogue stealth. It isn't at least with the latest nerf.

Ok, I'll go back to QQ land now... :?
Account has been closed at user's request.
User avatar
Shandorei
Journeyman Hunter
Journeyman Hunter
Posts: 233
Joined: Wed Jan 27, 2010 3:10 pm
Realm: Magtheridon
Gender: Male + ingame female

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Shandorei »

Haha :D

Well I just don't know, I have honestly never seen a hunter use it from another class' view, I want to see that before complaining anything about it :P

Image

Alright ... This signature was made by Saturo, and it was based on my old character! But now I rolled a new character and got my profile renamed! :D
User avatar
Dakonic
Artisan Hunter
Artisan Hunter
Posts: 729
Joined: Mon Feb 08, 2010 1:16 am
Realm: Baeglum
Gender: Female
Location: Redding,CA

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Dakonic »

Haha wow, I know several palllys who are not going to leave me alone. lol
Image
Dragon Cave: http://dragcave.net/user/Dakonic
Formally known as "celestial88"
Image Image Image Image
Slickrock
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 8:20 pm

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Slickrock »

Quelthasa wrote:Haha :D

Well I just don't know, I have honestly never seen a hunter use it from another class' view, I want to see that before complaining anything about it :P

Yeah, I would like to see a demo of it in an arena environment.

If MM glass-cannon builds still worked, it would be really useful for that.

I would also like to see what happens when your pet is attacking but you are not. Is your camo broken? or do you stay camoed? I can see BG usefulness if it stays.
Account has been closed at user's request.
Slickrock
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 8:20 pm

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Slickrock »

celestial88 wrote:Haha wow, I know several palllys who are not going to leave me alone. lol
Yeah, I'm already hearing "We got you nerfed" comments in the pally forums I frequent. Hence some of my frustration.
Account has been closed at user's request.
User avatar
Kalliope
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 14063
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
Realm: Dethecus
Location: Thedas
Contact:

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Kalliope »

Slickrock wrote:Regarding the whole nameplate and targeting thing, I would like to see if the camo'd hunter shows up via tab-targeting.
Now THIS is a good question. I'd also like to know if we're somewhat hidden on tracking.
Slickrock wrote:Also, since you can target the hunter that's in camo by clicking on him, assuming you know where he is or just get lucky, we are still subject to the rogue/warrior melee attacks. So we did get nerfed here. People seem to be thinking this is rogue stealth. It isn't at least with the latest nerf.
It. Is. Not. A. Nerf.

This was what Blizzard has INTENDED for camo for a long time, if not from the beginning. This is not new. If the skill was not working like this before, then it was a BUG. It's not just melee classes; anyone can do it. But we are IMMUNE to everything else. That's a lot.

You can see a camo'd hunter moving around, but it's MUCH harder to get a bead on them, to target them directly and melee them out. Running around in camo is not meant to be stealth. It just gives us more opportunity to set things up on our terms (like traps) and can give us a chance to jump players who aren't paying attention. It's easier to miss a camo'd hunter out of the corner of your eye than it is a non-camo'd hunter.

Image
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!

Slickrock
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 8:20 pm

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Slickrock »

Kalliope wrote:You can see a camo'd hunter moving around, but it's MUCH harder to get a bead on them, to target them directly and melee them out. Running around in camo is not meant to be stealth. It just gives us more opportunity to set things up on our terms (like traps) and can give us a chance to jump players who aren't paying attention. It's easier to miss a camo'd hunter out of the corner of your eye than it is a non-camo'd hunter.
Then it sounds much more BG than arena viable.. which is fine for me. :-)

The tab-targeting thing would kill it for most arenas if it can be detected that way.
Account has been closed at user's request.
User avatar
Wassa
Grand Master Hunter
Grand Master Hunter
Posts: 1542
Joined: Thu Jan 07, 2010 10:37 am

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Wassa »

Slickrock wrote:Ok, I'll go back to QQ land now... :?
Image

Image
A rare visitor to this forum now that I don't play WoW anymore, but forever a Petopian.

User avatar
Kalliope
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 14063
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
Realm: Dethecus
Location: Thedas
Contact:

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Kalliope »

Slickrock wrote:
Kalliope wrote:You can see a camo'd hunter moving around, but it's MUCH harder to get a bead on them, to target them directly and melee them out. Running around in camo is not meant to be stealth. It just gives us more opportunity to set things up on our terms (like traps) and can give us a chance to jump players who aren't paying attention. It's easier to miss a camo'd hunter out of the corner of your eye than it is a non-camo'd hunter.
Then it sounds much more BG than arena viable.. which is fine for me. :-)

The tab-targeting thing would kill it for most arenas if it can be detected that way.
From what I could see in the video I linked, the other hunter had to be clicked on in order to be targeted, but I'd like a proper confirmation on that from someone in beta. :)

Image
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!

Slickrock
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 3200
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 8:20 pm

Re: Haha! Catacylsm 85 -PET- vs lvl 85 paladin!

Unread post by Slickrock »

Wassa wrote:
Slickrock wrote:Ok, I'll go back to QQ land now... :?
Image
All for me?... Can I collect taxes?...
Account has been closed at user's request.
Locked