I also had more in my post you know.Worba wrote:That wasn't the question; it's a given that no action on Blizzard's part will ever get 100% approval from the players - the question is, broadly speaking, are players always/categorically wrong to be bothered when Blizzard takes something away that they [Blizzard] had unintentionally added?Ariamodasu wrote:People whine regardless though. Druids lost the ability to do fun stuff like running around as a skeleton in CAT form because a yellow bar is just "too difficult to notice", people are morons and do that so we just accept it.
People will think what they like about anything no matter how utterly infurating what is done is (WTB flight form Arokka again that was hilarious). Garwal should never have happened as cool as it was, that was as per usual players finding the unexpected. The owl as I stated, I doubt that was intentional but they thought "Eh" and left it. The Hydra/Slime wasn't intentional nor Ghost Wolf (Despite being badly handled afterwards), they left the tamees alone. This is all completely unlike Vanilla where the Snakes got to starve.
So all in all, Blizzard's game and we can have our own opinions/rage on the result of whatever they decide to do but they call the shots. It's nothing more difficult than that.