Ollof wrote:If doing anything that cannot be done “under normal circumstances” is an exploit then I would like to get the following “exploits” removed from the game.
Kara Chains macro: Under normal circumstances most people can’t target the chains fast enough.
Vash Toss macro: Under normal circumstances you cannot open your bag and toss the core fast enough.
Bite Macro: Without perfect timing you cannot maximize your DPS and then bite someone.
Stopcast Macros: No amount of timing can help you stop cast.
Macros that activate abilities that are not on your UI: You need to open your spell book like everyone that does not use a macro.
NPC scanners: Roll a class that can track or visually track the pets just like other people that don’t use addons.
Macros are not inherently an exploit, and you're misunderstanding what some people are saying in this thread.
There *is* something unusual about a method of taming that involves taming a pet, abandoning it and <i>logging out of the game</i> to login and retain a buff. In my opinion, I think its the "logging out" part of some of these types of taming that pushes the line just a tad. In normal gameplay, sure logging out is normal, but when you're using it to basically "cut off" a command line so the system registers your pet as both wild with the buff and tamed with the buff it does cross a line of "not normal".
That is what those who have been against this method have been stating over and over. Use of normal quick macros that involve normal spells and abilities is perfectly acceptable. I just think many people, myself included, have found issue with that last line of "logging out" to login to a pet that was forcefully abandoned in order to obtain a visual buff.
Now, while I think this is a clear exploit far different than Garwal taming or ghost wolf taming (which I previously elaborated on in pages back), I really don't think any players need to fear account bans other than those who are using this method to tame pets to do extra unintended damage. Also, I don't think any one player should feel as the root cause of all these tames. This method would've eventually been found; we've proven time and time again that the Hunter community is by far one of the most (and I'd argue THE MOST period) creative and genius ones at there: we see a pet we want, and we will try a million ways to get it before we throw in the towel. This chain of events was set in motion originally by the Garwal event, so I think it wouldn't be fair to place the entire cause and effect on one person ALTHOUGH I do also believe that the guide writers of these tames deserve credit for actually finding ways to pull such tames off (and I mean that sincerely, with no sarcasm. I think this was creative, even if it does push a personal borderline with me, and it doesn't change my opinion of those people who came up with these guides.
They saw a pet they wanted, and they never threw in the towel to obtain them.
Overall though, I do hope Blizzard responds to this matter in a much better way then the Ghost Wolf ("Yes you can keep taming them" "Hotfix:no longer tameable") and I do hope that the hunters do get to keep their altered pets.
PS:
Fiery boars are totally the coolest thing out of this. I'm just sayin, cmon. Why hasn't one named thiers "Dinner" yet? I totally would've =P