It doesn't matter where it came from, it's fire. This kind of loops back into my 'fire is not alive' argument, in that if it were, it would be an elemental - as Doomcookie clarified, I suppose that makes all fire elementals? Or maybe it's the more organized fire... - and therefore hunters wouldn't be able to control it in the first place.Jessibelle wrote:Actually an explosion from a seed isnt the same as an actual shamanistic elemental. ^^;TheDoomcookie wrote:I got your point, and I don't expect Abaesik to stay, but technically fire in the world of Warcraft is alive, which is how Shaman work with it as well as the other elements. But yeah, this would be more of a shaman pet (if shaman had pets :P) and not a hunter one. :)Nubhorns wrote:nothing more than a chemical reaction
At the end of the day though, I'm not here to dictate what is and isn't suitable for a hunter to tame. That's up to Blizzard. :P I don't know enough about non-Draenei/Orc lore to argue for or against elementals and what constitutes as 'living fire but not an elemental', but if all fire is living - and therefore closer to an elemental - even an explosion from a seed wouldn't be a 'beast' in the broadest sense of the word, because, well, it's fire - which loops back again to say that if the fire is an elemental and can think and act on it's own, it's still an elemental, and we've never been able to tame elementals. Which means this thread went in circles, and then stopped and went in circles again. Dizzy yet? :P












