
On Kahlua,, it would probally be PinchyColada (soon to be Madex) cause of the pun in the name which i like

HUGE thanks to Makoes, Syleye, FeralClaw, Pingupuff, Karin,Bowno, Varethyn, Ashaine, Kishay, Aki (Täräin13), my friend Marie and some lovely ppl on Fligth Rising for my lovely sig
* Flight Rising *"A bird doesn't sing because it has an answer, it sings because it has a song." - Lou Holtz
Sigs by the beautiful, talented Serenith, Kurenio, and Nili. Rock on, guys!
Avatars by Serenith, Sarah of Soaked, and other avatar artists.
The Pride of Nesingwary
Aritria, the Mother
Killasandra, the Daughter | Alessira, the Sister Adopted | Filomena, the Lover
You are putting way too much thought into the simple questionKurasu wrote:I think if I could tame one pet and one pet only.... I'd consider rerolling. The imbalance would be *way* too much without that variety of abilities and pets to choose from! I would need at least three pets to be able to play properly!
But if we could spec one single pet with all the abilities, and thus it wouldn't matter other than purely for skin? I would probably make it my turtle, Panzer. It would be painfully hard to choose between Panzer and Suresh, though.
I think he is being very sensible though, since nowadays a hunter buff matters a lot game-mechanic wise. An instance group without shaman will love you for a core hound but everyone always loves the cat str/agi boost.Roxhunt wrote:You are putting way too much thought into the simple questionKurasu wrote:I think if I could tame one pet and one pet only.... I'd consider rerolling. The imbalance would be *way* too much without that variety of abilities and pets to choose from! I would need at least three pets to be able to play properly!
But if we could spec one single pet with all the abilities, and thus it wouldn't matter other than purely for skin? I would probably make it my turtle, Panzer. It would be painfully hard to choose between Panzer and Suresh, though.
Oh, don't get me wrong, I didn't say what they said wasn't true or anything of that such. I didn't post the question for 'debate or analyzing' but just to see which pets had capture the hunter's heart. I mean, all buffs, etc aside, it might be the pet you first tame that you love dearly even if it's not the one you camped the longest, etc. Apparently the devilsaurs have your heart!Yoruko wrote:I think he is being very sensible though, since nowadays a hunter buff matters a lot game-mechanic wise. An instance group without shaman will love you for a core hound but everyone always loves the cat str/agi boost.Roxhunt wrote:You are putting way too much thought into the simple questionKurasu wrote:I think if I could tame one pet and one pet only.... I'd consider rerolling. The imbalance would be *way* too much without that variety of abilities and pets to choose from! I would need at least three pets to be able to play properly!
But if we could spec one single pet with all the abilities, and thus it wouldn't matter other than purely for skin? I would probably make it my turtle, Panzer. It would be painfully hard to choose between Panzer and Suresh, though.PVP can be quite difficult without an appropriate pet to give you an edge and never forget thunderstomp! There's already at least three or four pets to keep in handy for situational reasons rather than sentiment.
Still, if I had to pick.. it would be devilsaurs all the way. ALL THE WAY!
Epic Sig by the Epic CandidHeartbeat <3
Azerothian Days
You only get one!Shirubia wrote:I think in the end it would be Dishu (PvE) or Magria (PvP)
The burns of a fire may heal with time
but the burns from our love will never heal, even as the years pass on
{My Magistream Keep}{My DA}{My DC scroll}