Oh you're right! Sorry I had no idea they were the same thing. It's been too long. Of the three NPCs, one has "Terrifying Screech", one has "Terrify" and the other "Screech". The latter just reduces attack power, but the other two do the same thing.TheDoomcookie wrote:I fear is what I mentioned earlier. XD I always thought their fears were caused by a screech or something. I actually avoid killing dinosaurs as much as possible so I don't pay too much attention to their attack names.
*wowheads*
Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansions?
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
- Miacoda
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:25 am
- Realm: Argent Dawn(US) - Alliance, Nesingwary(US) - Horde
- Gender: Female
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi

Man. All this Pterrordax talk is making me want one even moooore!
Thank you to everyone who has made me a signature!
AKA TheDoomcookie
Mia's Stable|DeviantArt|Tumblr
- Ickabob
- Artisan Hunter
- Posts: 519
- Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:43 am
- Realm: Proudmoore
- Gender: Male
- Location: Lost in the Appearance Tab. Send help!
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
- Snowy
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 5037
- Joined: Sun Oct 23, 2011 12:25 pm
- Gender: Female
- Location: England!
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Ickabob wrote:I'd like to see a new family for lizards, with Mushan beasts, basilisks, and Diemetodons. And hydras. And what is this about porcupines?! Really?
Porcupines are currently tameable on the beta. They're a little bugged right now and considered to be 'boars', but it looks like, yes, we're getting them.
I don't wanna shatter anyone's hopes and dreams or anything but... I can't see yaks becoming a pet family. Because of the size of them and the current yak mounts we've seen so far, my mind considers them a lot like mammoths - mounts and that's it. I can see cranes getting their own family since I'm not 100% sure they'd quite fit into the bird of prey one. I would love to see pterrodaxs make an appearance as a pet. Everytime I'm in Un'Goro and I see one I wonder why on earth we can't get them as pets. We could end up having a dinosaur pet family that devilsaurs and raptors could also be squished into, that'd be amazing imo. Devilsaurs, raptors, pterrodaxs, diemetradons...
Snowy the Sylveon Hoarder ♥
3DS FC: 1263-6698-4911 | FR: EnchantedEcho | PSN: Eviesaurus
My YouTube Channel! (Pokemon related stuffs!)
- Gimlion
- Grand Master Hunter
- Posts: 1912
- Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2010 11:57 am
- Realm: Nordrassil
- Gender: Male
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Actually, I've been hoping for tamable Mammoths/Elekks since Wrath... I think they'd make fun pets, with some sort of trunk swipe!Everdeen wrote:Ickabob wrote:I'd like to see a new family for lizards, with Mushan beasts, basilisks, and Diemetodons. And hydras. And what is this about porcupines?! Really?Porcupines are currently tameable on the beta. They're a little bugged right now and considered to be 'boars', but it looks like, yes, we're getting them.
I don't wanna shatter anyone's hopes and dreams or anything but... I can't see yaks becoming a pet family. Because of the size of them and the current yak mounts we've seen so far, my mind considers them a lot like mammoths - mounts and that's it. I can see cranes getting their own family since I'm not 100% sure they'd quite fit into the bird of prey one. I would love to see pterrodaxs make an appearance as a pet. Everytime I'm in Un'Goro and I see one I wonder why on earth we can't get them as pets. We could end up having a dinosaur pet family that devilsaurs and raptors could also be squished into, that'd be amazing imo. Devilsaurs, raptors, pterrodaxs, diemetradons...

"You cannot judge me, I am Justice itself! We were meant for more than this, to protect the innocent. But, if our precious laws bind you all to inaction, then I will no longer stand as your brother." - Tyrael
- Miacoda
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 3140
- Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 2:25 am
- Realm: Argent Dawn(US) - Alliance, Nesingwary(US) - Horde
- Gender: Female
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Thank you to everyone who has made me a signature!
AKA TheDoomcookie
Mia's Stable|DeviantArt|Tumblr
- SpiritBinder
- Mount Master
- Posts: 3260
- Joined: Tue Jan 05, 2010 11:45 pm
- Realm: Aman'Thul
- Location: Australia
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Yeah it would be a tad sad it they where all thrown in together. It would be akin to putting Cranes, Owls, Vultures, Eagles and Tallstriders all into one family and just calling them "birds".TheDoomcookie wrote:I think I dinosaur family would be cool... But I'd much prefer they each got their own families. I have a very close bond with Krush, and I feel like if he were paired up with other dinosaurs, he'd out shine them all. X.x I dunno if that'd actually happen, but I see it likely so I'd just rather have them be separate. XD
Then they have already separated Devilsaurs and Raptors and those guys are pretty dam similar when it comes to anatomy and makeup. That and Pterrordax are just to neat to be just tossed into another group imo

◄ ─ T A N N O N ─ T H E ─ S P I R I T B I N D E R ─ ►
- Kalliope
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 14063
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
- Realm: Dethecus
- Location: Thedas
- Contact:
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
True enough.Spiritbinder wrote:Yeah it would be a tad sad it they where all thrown in together. It would be akin to putting Cranes, Owls, Vultures, Eagles and Tallstriders all into one family and just calling them "birds".TheDoomcookie wrote:I think I dinosaur family would be cool... But I'd much prefer they each got their own families. I have a very close bond with Krush, and I feel like if he were paired up with other dinosaurs, he'd out shine them all. X.x I dunno if that'd actually happen, but I see it likely so I'd just rather have them be separate. XD
Then they have already separated Devilsaurs and Raptors and those guys are pretty dam similar when it comes to anatomy and makeup. That and Pterrordax are just to neat to be just tossed into another group imo![]()
These are all VERY good reasons that shouldn't happen.

Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!
- cowmuflage
- Petopia Artist
- Posts: 11998
- Joined: Thu Mar 11, 2010 10:00 pm
- Realm: dath remar
- Gender: female
- Location: New zealand, auckland
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Heres my DA page
My wow model sheets (NSFW) that anyone can use!
First 251 Pokemon in Adventure time style! By me XD
Cow's art thread!
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Yeah, in fact (in the real world at least) all those birds are far more closely related to each other than raptors and pterrosaurs would be! Actually, velociraptors and birds are much closer tooSpiritbinder wrote:Yeah it would be a tad sad it they where all thrown in together. It would be akin to putting Cranes, Owls, Vultures, Eagles and Tallstriders all into one family and just calling them "birds".TheDoomcookie wrote:I think I dinosaur family would be cool... But I'd much prefer they each got their own families. I have a very close bond with Krush, and I feel like if he were paired up with other dinosaurs, he'd out shine them all. X.x I dunno if that'd actually happen, but I see it likely so I'd just rather have them be separate. XD
Then they have already separated Devilsaurs and Raptors and those guys are pretty dam similar when it comes to anatomy and makeup. That and Pterrordax are just to neat to be just tossed into another group imo![]()


- Vephriel
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 16412
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:07 pm
- Realm: Wyrmrest Accord US
- Gender: Female
- Location: Canada
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
- Attachments
-
- WoWScrnShot_051912_123817.png (221.41 KiB) Viewed 2381 times
- Ziarre
- Grand Master Hunter
- Posts: 1896
- Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:06 pm
- Realm: Proudmoore-US, Wyrmrest Accord-US
- Gender: Female
- Location: Right behind you...
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Put diemetradons in Crocolisk family please. :<
- Myrrmi
- Master Hunter
- Posts: 1124
- Joined: Sat May 19, 2012 7:48 am
- Realm: [EU] The Mealstron, Emerald Dream, Bloodhoof
- Gender: Dwarfette
- Location: Proland
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
+1Ziarre wrote:Put diemetradons in Crocolisk family please. :<
This or basilisks, although I think they do fit with the crocolisk better.

Growing Internet Dragons:
(> My DragonCave <|> My TaleofDragons <|> My MagiStream <|> My FlightRising <)
Please, CLICK so we don't run out of Internet Dragons to kill

- Vephriel
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 16412
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:07 pm
- Realm: Wyrmrest Accord US
- Gender: Female
- Location: Canada
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Theoretically I think we could be done with new pet families. We have 6 new ones now, and that's enough to wager that they don't plan on adding more.
I still have this small hope that they'll surprise us toward the end with one or two new families that we were asking for, but we have no reason to complain if the 6 that were introduced is all we're getting in MoP. It's more than we got in Cataclysm, and on par with the amount we got in The Burning Crusade. I can't help but think if they're going to release new families they'd work on that all at once and get their abilities sorted out together.
I know it's kind of a drag about hydras, but if we don't get them then I guess we don't get them for now.

- Kalliope
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 14063
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
- Realm: Dethecus
- Location: Thedas
- Contact:
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Mmm, I'm not so sure that it's now or never. There aren't any hydras in Pandaria, and every single one of the new families added has some sort of representation out there. Fen striders got lumped in with the new water striders, so they got a pass.Vephriel wrote:I know it's kind of a drag about hydras, but if we don't get them this expansion I guess we don't get them.I'm sure there's a reason behind it as they're well aware of how popular they are with the community in general. We'd have them by now, so I can only assume there's something holding them back.
Overall, this has been the theme of new families, looking back at the previous expansions. The only arguable additions are from Wrath: core hounds and silithids don't have tamable representation in Northrend (and even core hounds get a bit of a pass, since there's a representative inside Violet Hold). However, Wrath was also the expansion in which exotics were added, so exceptions make some degree of sense.
And yet, while there's all that solid reasoning, the fact remains that some players DO have actual hydra pets. They wouldn't've been made a real family if Blizzard hadn't been considering giving them to us. So I do agree that there is likely some reason they're being held back. Blizzard knows how much players pine for "limited edition" (read: totally unintended) pets; they learned that with the ghost wolves. Here's hoping that whatever they have planned, it'll work out sooner than later.
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!
- Vephriel
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 16412
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:07 pm
- Realm: Wyrmrest Accord US
- Gender: Female
- Location: Canada
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
- Kalliope
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 14063
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
- Realm: Dethecus
- Location: Thedas
- Contact:
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Ooh, nod.Vephriel wrote:Oops, didn't word that very well, I wasn't trying to say I don't think we'll EVER get them if they don't show up now, just that we might not get them for MoP. I meant it more as a "if we don't get them we don't get them, maybe next time".


Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!
- Rawr
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 4481
- Joined: Thu Jul 01, 2010 10:21 pm
- Realm: Draka-Wyrmrest Accord
- Gender: Female
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
Pterosaurs and the Plesiosauria (Lock Ness-like monsters in wow) aren't even dinosaurs so they shouldn't be lumped with them. (I really want a Deep Sea Threshadon )Spiritbinder wrote:Yeah it would be a tad sad it they where all thrown in together. It would be akin to putting Cranes, Owls, Vultures, Eagles and Tallstriders all into one family and just calling them "birds".TheDoomcookie wrote:I think I dinosaur family would be cool... But I'd much prefer they each got their own families. I have a very close bond with Krush, and I feel like if he were paired up with other dinosaurs, he'd out shine them all. X.x I dunno if that'd actually happen, but I see it likely so I'd just rather have them be separate. XD
Then they have already separated Devilsaurs and Raptors and those guys are pretty dam similar when it comes to anatomy and makeup. That and Pterrordax are just to neat to be just tossed into another group imo![]()

- Andine
- Expert Hunter
- Posts: 450
- Joined: Wed Dec 01, 2010 9:16 am
- Realm: Moonglade
- Gender: Female char
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
So I reckon we get those six now, and that's it for MoP.

- Kalliope
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 14063
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
- Realm: Dethecus
- Location: Thedas
- Contact:
Re: Speculation: Number of new species introduced in expansi
If someone upstairs really thought those things, the ghost hydras wouldn't actually be hydras. Or if they (god forbid) changed their minds, those same hydras would most likely go back to the crocolisk family.Andine wrote:As for hydras and their chances of tameability, I think it's one of those arbitrary policies Blizzard seems to teem with. Someone up there probably thinks "we don't want hunters to tame hydras / we don't think hydras fit our artistic vision / we think lack of hydras for hunters is vital to the game style of WoW". Yes, none of those three arguments make sense, but you'd find Blizzard uses them much more often than they should.
So I reckon we get those six now, and that's it for MoP.
Whatever the actual reasoning behind the call, I just don't think that's it.
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!