BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Treat others with respect. Report, don't respond. Read the complete forum rules.
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
- Quiv
- Community Resource
- Posts: 3011
- Joined: Fri Dec 10, 2010 10:56 am
- Realm: Thrall - Garona (US)
- Gender: Dood
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Are the special abilities like Lust/Hero the only thing unique about the spec itself now? If the damage is normalized, then I assume things like Spiked Collar is removed or changed. And if thats the case, are other spec defining abilities also removed/changed, such as Rhino Blood? That sounds like steps both toward and away from homogenization.
Maybe battle Rez is too powerful to be a family ability. Maybe it should be the Cunning or Tenacity spec ability, and move Survival of the Fittest or MAster's Call to a family. Combine that with being able to choose a spec, maybe that could be a middle ground. It would allow for all sorts of combinations to combat homogenization (if thats even a problem worth combating) while still offering some restrictions with the spec passives. This would mean 3 hunters all with Spirit Beasts could bring a unique powerful ability each while able to use the pet they want.
Just spit balling. I hope theres some open discussion on it and not just a "this is how it is, make all the threads and tweets you want, it won't matter" approach.
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Then give Cranes, Moths, and Quilens a different ability. (Dodge, Dispel, Mortal Strike, respectively)
Then just let us choose our spec for our pets.
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
someday I'll find someplace to host a sig that isn't stupid money-grubbing photobucket
-
- Pet Finder
- Posts: 5384
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:16 pm
- Realm: Shadow Council
- Gender: Male
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Abilities
Demon Commander: Summon a Demonic Commander to increase the duration of all of your current demons by 15.0 sec, and increase the damage of all of your other demons by 15%, while casting Shadow Bolt Volley at your enemies.
Molten Core: When your Wild Imps expend all of their energy, they have a 15% chance to combust into a ball of energy, granting you a stack of Molten Core.
Molten Core reduces the cast time of Soulfire by 75%. Maximum 4 stacks.
Soulfire: Calls down a demonic meteor full of Wild Imps which burst forth to attack the target.for until cancelled.
Deals up to 0 Shadowflame damage on impact to all enemies within 0 yds of the target
Hand of Doom
applies Doom to each target
and summons up to 0 Wild Imps, based on Soul Shards consumed.
Talents
Bilescourge Bombers: Tear open a portal to the nether above the target location, from which several Bilescourge will pour out of and crash into the ground, dealing 1 damage to all enemies within 0 yards.
Tier 4 Talent, in place of Soul Harvest
Demonbolt: Removed
Demonic Calling: Shadowbolt has a 20% chance to make your next Call Dreadstalkers cost no Soul Shards.
Demonic Consumption: Your Demon Commander now destroys and absorbs the remaining power of all of your Wild Imps to empower himself.
Tier 6 Talent, in place of Doom
Demonic Strength: Infuse your Felguard with demonic power, increasing all damage it deals by 100% and causing it to use a bonus attack every 5 sec for 20 sec.
Tier 4 Talent, in place of Hand of Doom
Summon Vilefiend: Summon a Vielfiend to fight for you for the next 15 sec.
Hand of Doom: Removed
Imp Swarm: Summon 5 Wild Imps around you.
Power Siphon: Instantly sacrifice up to 4 Wild Imps to generate 4 charges of Molten Core.
Riders: Hand of Gul'dan has a 25% chance per Soul Shard spent to spawn an additional Wild Imp.
Now requires Level 30, up from 10
Cost changed from 1 Soul Shards to None
Cast Time changed from 1.5 sec cast to None
Impending Doom: Removed
Implosion: Removed
Improved Dreadstalkers: Removed
Inner Demons: Imp Swarm is now a passive ability that summons one Wild Imp every 10 sec.
Every time this summons a Wild Imp, you have a 20% chance to also a summon an additional Demon to fight for you for until cancelled.
Tier 7 Talent, in place of Soul Conduit
Nether Portal: Tear open a portal to the Twisting Nether for 20 sec. Every time you spend Soul Shards, you will also command demons from the Nether to come out and fight for you.
Tier 7 Talent, in place of Demonbolt
Overloaded: Molten Core now makes Soulfire instant cast.
Tier 4 Talent, in place of Power Trip
Power Trip: Removed
Shadow Bolt: Removed
Shadowflame: Removed
Soul Harvest: Removed
Soul Harvest: Changed from Demonology/Affliction to Affliction
Summon Darkglare: Removed
- Vephriel
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 16398
- Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 8:07 pm
- Realm: Wyrmrest Accord US
- Gender: Female
- Location: Canada
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Blue chiming in, I think overall I can see what they're trying to go for and it's not awful, I'm just not thrilled about the locked in specs. We won't get a battle res anymore which is a bit of a bummer but honestly trying to use it in end game situations was clunky and unreliable at best so maybe it's better this way.
I'll admit that my initial impressions were based on the worry that pets were being locked into the old specs as they had originally been - it hadn't been obvious at the beginning that damage had been normalized (to be fair though it came as such a shock at the time it's not hard to forgive people for not picking up on that during the initial confusion). I'm a lot more comfortable with the proposed changes now and I think we will get better choice overall and more variety.
-
- Pet Finder
- Posts: 5384
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:16 pm
- Realm: Shadow Council
- Gender: Male
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
-
- Journeyman Hunter
- Posts: 170
- Joined: Fri Jan 26, 2018 1:35 pm
- Realm: Everywhere
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
That's the most blue text I've seen about hunters in one post in years..

Looking at that post, that does change things. The removal of Brez hurts to some degree, but let's be fair, it was always clunky, especially in raids, where getting your pet to where the body was wasn't always easy.
This certainly makes spirit beasts much more viable again, but tenacity pets will certainly be the go-to for raiding.
- Rhyela
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 6857
- Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 12:13 pm
- Realm: US - Ysera
- Gender: Female playing males and females
- Location: My chair
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Overall, these changes sound like they'll be a good thing. I'm unsure how I feel about locked specs, but at least the health and damage will be the same no matter which pet we use. Some of the spec changes make sense, others not so much. I'll miss Thunderstomp, though.
Signature and avatar created by Serenith!
Slickrock wrote:Given their current trend, we'll probably get a spirit toucan that farts loops.
- Lupen202
- Grand Master Hunter
- Posts: 1972
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 9:19 am
- Realm: Burning Blade, Frostwolf, Proudmoore
- Gender: Female
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
I mean sure, tenacity might be go-to for raiding, or ferocity if a lust is needed. But that's still MILES better than what we have current - being forced to use just one or two families vs multiple. I have the freedom to bring a wolf, or a cat for lust now, not just rays or corehounds. That's amazing.
Sure it'd still be nice to pick what spec we want our pets to be, but I do like having a little thought into what I use. And seeing as they don't have any actual dmg or tanking advantages over one another, what spec you take is going to be so minor anyway.
Neiara - NE Hunter - Burning Blade (US) - Denial of Service
| My Mount Collection |
| Flight Rising |
- Xella
- Artisan Hunter
- Posts: 681
- Joined: Mon Mar 14, 2011 11:53 pm
- Realm: Skywall-US
- Gender: Female
- Contact:
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
If they're actually straight up removing brez (which was not the case when we first started this thread), I feel a little bit better about it, though I still am not pleased with not being able to choose what spec my pets are. I'm not (nor do I expect to be) in a position where I'll be berated for not having the tenacity pet out all the time, but every time I die with just a small bit of overkill, I'll know that having a "real" pet out would have saved me :P
- Lupen202
- Grand Master Hunter
- Posts: 1972
- Joined: Wed Jul 06, 2011 9:19 am
- Realm: Burning Blade, Frostwolf, Proudmoore
- Gender: Female
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
I do hope though they tweak some of the specs. Hyenas & raptors should be ferocity IMO. Clefthooves make way more sense as tenacity. Scalehides make more sense as tenacity as well.
Neiara - NE Hunter - Burning Blade (US) - Denial of Service
| My Mount Collection |
| Flight Rising |
- Teigan
- Illustrious Master Hunter
- Posts: 5164
- Joined: Fri Mar 12, 2010 6:05 am
- Realm: Proudmoore (A), Thrall (H)
- Gender: Male
- Location: Somewhere in a cornfield
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Well, he names things "Fluffy" Must be an alright guyAt the same time, the Hunter who has grown attached to their spider named Fluffy should feel effective across the game.

But, my thoughts...
I kinda welcome the loss of battle rez. It was awkward. I'm sure I'll miss it at times, but I'll be glad not to fumble around with it.
When he says the most pets lack an ability right now, I can't help but think "yeah, they do, cause you took them away and didn't replace them" So, that feels a little like when they took our abilities away so that they could give them back in bits and pieces via legendaries and artifacts.
I don't like the name of "Survival of the Fittest." That phrase refers, in evolution, to the ability to produce offspring. It means the "fittest to reproduce" not the fittest rat in the gym. It has nothing to do with being physically tough, though it can. It's misused frequently and irks me every time I see it.
They really need to re-think their casting of certain families. I want to know by what logic a scalehide isn't tenacity, etc, etc. Hopefully that will be ironed out.
However, overall, I think this could work out. It's different, and some of it bothers me. But, it's not the end of the world and I look forward to most of it, tbh.
- NazzyDragon
- Journeyman Hunter
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2015 10:31 pm
- Realm: Emerald Dream (US)
- Gender: Female
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Everything is GREAT. FANTASTIC. Just... why are specs locked?! Going against what the blue is even saying, honestly..
-
- Pet Finder
- Posts: 5384
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:16 pm
- Realm: Shadow Council
- Gender: Male
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
I don't see how it is going against everything the Blue said. Ferocity, Tenacity, and Cunning will all have the same damage, health, and armor. They can all tank and dps. Abilities like Blood of the Rhino and Combat Training will be rolled into every pet by default. The families will be made far more unique than they currently are, since there are several that do not have any abilities outside of the default ones. A pet having hero or not is irrelevant, since any decent raid group will have plenty of individuals capable of providing that.
Honestly, this isn't bad at all. So what if they're spec locked? It isn't like Ferocity will be doing more damage than Cunning and Tenacity, or Tenacity will have a better chance of surviving than Cunning and Ferocity. It really isn't a big deal.
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Can I asl you what kind of playstyle would be ruined if Scalehides are ferocity?NazzyDragon wrote:Pet spec locking is still not okay. Especially since my favorite tenacity pets were changed out of tenacity baseline... tell me again why my thunder lizard is FEROCITY???
Everything is GREAT. FANTASTIC. Just... why are specs locked?! Going against what the blue is even saying, honestly..
- NazzyDragon
- Journeyman Hunter
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2015 10:31 pm
- Realm: Emerald Dream (US)
- Gender: Female
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Using that pet as my tenacity pet for the extra HP and CD. It's the only tenacity skin I really like?pop wrote:Can I asl you what kind of playstyle would be ruined if Scalehides are ferocity?NazzyDragon wrote:Pet spec locking is still not okay. Especially since my favorite tenacity pets were changed out of tenacity baseline... tell me again why my thunder lizard is FEROCITY???
Everything is GREAT. FANTASTIC. Just... why are specs locked?! Going against what the blue is even saying, honestly..
The simple fact that tenacity has the best cooldown/passive and that cunning will be the only pet you can use in PvPValnaaros wrote: Honestly, this isn't bad at all. So what if they're spec locked? It isn't like Ferocity will be doing more damage than Cunning and Tenacity, or Tenacity will have a better chance of surviving than Cunning and Ferocity. It really isn't a big deal.
Ferocity doesn't matter, and all of my favorite skins are ferocity. AKA UTTERLY USELESS because, as you said, lust is almost always covered anyways. Can't lust in arena. Don't need lust in raid. Why do I need lust in 5 mans or open world? Useless. Let me change the spec.
I wanted to use my wolf in arena since he'll have a slow, but guess what? Ferocity. Doesn't matter. Master's call is MANDATORY for any form of PvP. Can't use it. Great. Useless pet. I can use LESS pets in BfA than I can now.
-
- Pet Finder
- Posts: 1987
- Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:37 pm
- Gender: Exploiter
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Twitter: @BlahBlahblabbe1
Knockoff Twitter: @campaigner.bsky.social
Come troll my accounts and hot takes!
Times banned from World of Warcraft: 1
Reason for ban: Reporting an item duplication exploit with Pet Battles I accidentally found during Mists of Pandaria. 3 week duration.
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
- NazzyDragon
- Journeyman Hunter
- Posts: 146
- Joined: Fri Jun 12, 2015 10:31 pm
- Realm: Emerald Dream (US)
- Gender: Female
Re: BFA Taking a Step Back for Pets. :/ (Specializations)
Agree very much, especially with "If they're all the same DPS-wise, why would it matter what spec they're in?" -- really makes no sense. Feels like the specs are less unique in BfA than they are now.WerebearGuy wrote:Honestly, this is a really stupid situation. Remove battle resurrection (STONE DOG BARK, GET BACK UP), remove Bloodlust/Heroism (DAT DOUBLE DOGGO ROARED, I SWING FASTER NOW), let pets swap specs for their own personal utility. If they're all the same DPS-wise, why would it matter what spec they're in? The bonus healer/Shaman/Mage abilities were always random and out of place, even if it was kind of cool to be the wildcard for buffs. Remove the Heroism from Ferocity, remove the bonus damage reduction to YOU (makes no sense again), make Master's Call a baseline BM ability and only work on you (balance), leave the Leech/Health/Speed as they are (maybe double them), and let players change specializations for the pets. Problem solved, Hunter pets back to being fun without being required.
https://us.battle.net/forums/en/wow/topic/20761876043
This post sums up what I want to see fairly well, and has a different solution that I also like instead of just "let hunters change specs" --- this is still fine too and I'd be ok if they just let us swap specs again, but this post is very interesting.