I get that a lot of people want to be dragon tamers, and there are npcs with dragons, and mounts, and some dragons aren't that unconquerable in the game. And there's now Lung that can be pets
![Rolling Eyes :roll:](./images/smilies/icon_rolleyes.gif)
in addition to chimeara and hydra. There are old threads about this, so I won't go into it much here, and I'm not going to argue now. What I say won't change any pro-dragon tamer's mind, and what anyone here has to say won't change mine, on whether or not they should be tameable. And I'm not trying to change any developer's mind, so there's no need to get heated about this. My purpose here is to explain -why- I think they're untameable, because I don't think the "sentience" factor has much to do with it at all.
Dragons, as a concept, are not tameable. It's one of the defining characteristics. When they are in folklore, they're wild, and most fiction, taming dragons is the exception proving the rule. Even in warcraft lore, red dragons were _unwilling_slaves_ of the dragonmaw. Dragons are not in the same class as piggies, which making them hunter pets would be. Tameable dragons would be spectacle creep / "badass decay".