Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Read-only since Patch 4.2 is now live.
Worba
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 3522
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:56 pm
Realm: Uther, Zangarmarsh, Shu'halo, Fenris, Quel'Thalas+
Gender: Orc
Location: In Sethekk Halls, bothering Anzu (90 runs and counting)

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Worba »

Alleryn wrote:However, I will enjoy sitting and watching jagoffs try to grief hunters by killing the rares, only to be one-shot, melted, or eaten alive. :)
That alone makes them awesome.
User avatar
Dolias
Posts: 22
Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2011 8:45 pm
Realm: Thrall
Gender: Alpha

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Dolias »

already 3x more rare pets in Cata than Wrath
I can't complain really.

just think, if this course model is a hit in 4.2... you could see 8 more rares in 4.4
seriously, this is THE hunter xpac
The Lone Hunter
TygerDarkstorm
 Community Resource
 Community Resource
Posts: 14480
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:15 pm
Realm: Staghelm (Alliance), Wyrmrest Accord (Horde)
Gender: Female playing both genders
Location: WoW

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by TygerDarkstorm »

Dolias wrote: just think, if this course model is a hit in 4.2... you could see 8 more rares in 4.4
This is what I'm hoping for. Not necessarily 8 new pets every patch, but this setup paving the way for future pet challenges where they might even be more inclined to give us brand new models/skins. I feel that this one being given in 4.2 is a testing grounds, so to speak.

Follow me on Tumblr! @projectashley
Like Crochet? You can see what I make @ facebook.com/AshedCreations

Lord Godfrey wrote:Some people only want to watch the world burn. Others want to be the ones responsible for burning it...
[/center]
User avatar
Royi
 
Posts: 3689
Joined: Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:08 pm
Realm: Ysera
Location: Under a Rock

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Royi »

TygerDarkstorm wrote:
Dolias wrote: just think, if this course model is a hit in 4.2... you could see 8 more rares in 4.4
This is what I'm hoping for. Not necessarily 8 new pets every patch, but this setup paving the way for future pet challenges where they might even be more inclined to give us brand new models/skins. I feel that this one being given in 4.2 is a testing grounds, so to speak.
That would be lovely :)

I'm not a fan of spiders so even though they have some neat neon legs, i'm not going to rush out and tame them. I may end up going for one or two with the unique tame mechanics, but I'm a bit sad that 5 spiders and 3 spirit beasts at the 8. If you're a SV hunter who doesnt like spiders, there really isnt a draw for me here. Oh well here's to hoping for 4.4! :)
:) ~ Formally known as Royi ~
User avatar
MajorThor
Expert Hunter
Expert Hunter
Posts: 289
Joined: Sat Apr 09, 2011 10:34 am
Realm: Arthas-US
Gender: God.
Location: Asgard, Valhalla District.

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by MajorThor »

Worba wrote:
Psymon777 wrote:1: A Fire Fox ( i mean come on, how cool would that be) :D
Not to detract from the upcoming special tames, but since you mentioned it... I'd love to see (someday) a spirit beast rendition of the japanese 9 tailed fox. It would be a challenging project for their artists to give it the "Blizzard Look", but if they pulled it off I'd be ecstatic.

Kybuui-kun!!!!!

Hail Thor-show thy might. Let thunder roar and lightning strike!
Hurl thy hammer into the fray. And let thine enemies know fear this day!
VICTORY, OR VALHALLA!!!

User avatar
Kalliope
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 14063
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
Realm: Dethecus
Location: Thedas
Contact:

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Kalliope »

The really cool thing about this experiment is that it's all neatly organized. We get a set of SBs and a set of spiders. It just looks pretty from a design standpoint.

While on the one hand, mixing it up a bit would have been good in other ways, I actually really like what this turned out to be. :)

Image
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!

User avatar
Gelannerai
Journeyman Hunter
Journeyman Hunter
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:09 am
Realm: Baelgun
Gender: Male
Location: Haddonfield, IL

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Gelannerai »

TygerDarkstorm wrote:
Dolias wrote: just think, if this course model is a hit in 4.2... you could see 8 more rares in 4.4
This is what I'm hoping for. Not necessarily 8 new pets every patch, but this setup paving the way for future pet challenges where they might even be more inclined to give us brand new models/skins. I feel that this one being given in 4.2 is a testing grounds, so to speak.

Yeah, that's pretty much the way I'm looking at it as well. They may not have wanted to over-extend themselves on creating brand new models/skins on an unproven game mechanic. Looking at it that way, we should definitely support the effort even if we aren't all that enthusiastic about the selection of pets presented this time around. Plus, Deth is growing on me...........
TygerDarkstorm
 Community Resource
 Community Resource
Posts: 14480
Joined: Wed Sep 15, 2010 10:15 pm
Realm: Staghelm (Alliance), Wyrmrest Accord (Horde)
Gender: Female playing both genders
Location: WoW

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by TygerDarkstorm »

Gelannerai wrote:
TygerDarkstorm wrote:
Dolias wrote: just think, if this course model is a hit in 4.2... you could see 8 more rares in 4.4
This is what I'm hoping for. Not necessarily 8 new pets every patch, but this setup paving the way for future pet challenges where they might even be more inclined to give us brand new models/skins. I feel that this one being given in 4.2 is a testing grounds, so to speak.

Yeah, that's pretty much the way I'm looking at it as well. They may not have wanted to over-extend themselves on creating brand new models/skins on an unproven game mechanic. Looking at it that way, we should definitely support the effort even if we aren't all that enthusiastic about the selection of pets presented this time around. Plus, Deth is growing on me...........
Exactly! If this idea doesn't work out as well as they had hoped, then it would almost be a waste of new models. Blizzard's been known to use WoW as a sort of guinea pig for their ideas, which makes this a good way to implement the unused Gondria skins and whatnot instead of new models, although, to be fair, that spirit beast owl is a sort of new model/skin (it is actually different from Olm).

Now, if they continue this trend of neat taming methods and just keep reissuing old pets, I'll be upset. I would have loved to see more variety in this go around (5 spiders is a lot), but I'm not complaining. :) I'm glad they're doing this for us hunters and I look forward to the future of challenge taming.

Follow me on Tumblr! @projectashley
Like Crochet? You can see what I make @ facebook.com/AshedCreations

Lord Godfrey wrote:Some people only want to watch the world burn. Others want to be the ones responsible for burning it...
[/center]
User avatar
Kalliope
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 14063
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
Realm: Dethecus
Location: Thedas
Contact:

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Kalliope »

We're running out of unused models, thanks to Noah's efforts. :) When that happens, everything will HAVE to be new! ;)

Image
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!

User avatar
Gelannerai
Journeyman Hunter
Journeyman Hunter
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:09 am
Realm: Baelgun
Gender: Male
Location: Haddonfield, IL

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Gelannerai »

Yeah, if this is just the learning phase, then the pet selection is forgiveable for the most part.

I do have a question though, and I'm not looking to stir up any animosity, but I keep seeing people say that these aren't re-skins. I'm curious what people do consider to be re-skins if these aren't.
User avatar
Ziarre
Grand Master Hunter
Grand Master Hunter
Posts: 1896
Joined: Sat Nov 13, 2010 2:06 pm
Realm: Proudmoore-US, Wyrmrest Accord-US
Gender: Female
Location: Right behind you...

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Ziarre »

Possibly something that's created after the original.
Acherontia wrote:

It's like daring someone to go insult a bunch of kindly old nuns. You'll wind up going back to your friends with a story about how they smiled at your insults and tried to give you cookies, or something.

Shaiel - 110 Night Elf Hunter
Sahkar - 110 Mag'har Orc Hunter
Tumblr!

User avatar
Gelannerai
Journeyman Hunter
Journeyman Hunter
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:09 am
Realm: Baelgun
Gender: Male
Location: Haddonfield, IL

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Gelannerai »

Ziarre wrote:Possibly something that's created after the original.
Ah, ok. Palette-swap would probably be a better term then.
Worba
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 3522
Joined: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:56 pm
Realm: Uther, Zangarmarsh, Shu'halo, Fenris, Quel'Thalas+
Gender: Orc
Location: In Sethekk Halls, bothering Anzu (90 runs and counting)

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Worba »

Just speculating, but I've had the growing sense that the cost / effort involved in developing, testing and implementing a new model, may be fairly extreme... moreso than one might think.

For example...

1) Several of the most awesome creatures from the cata concept art, read: spiny raptor and Volcanoth, never made it to production. Now I can sort of see replacing the Volcanoth with the ancient fire turtle - even though it's not really a new model, the fire turtle is quite visually impressive... but the spiny raptors? There is no reason to recycle outland raptors for that role when they already had such incredible concept art for it - unless the new model entailed a lot of work (by "a lot", I mean "to the point that it would rob significant time away from more important things like balancing, debugging and such" - this is not to be taken as suggesting any lack of will or devotion on Blizzard's part!) .

2) To-date all models seem to have been designed primarily for use as NPCs, and secondarily if at all as hunter pets. Again, note this is not a complaint - I'm absolutely fine with this, as a hunter player, just noting that at least from the pattern thus far, it seems as though one class by itself has not been enough justification for developing an entirely new model.

Could be wrong - like anyone else I'd love to see new models, particularly models-just-for-us-that-devour-griefers, but until proven so this should be kept in mind when Blizzard adds existing models with new skins. :)

Actually Wain, if you're reading this, could you please ask Noah if this theory is anywhere near the mark? This is something I'd love to know about.
User avatar
Derax
 Community Resource
 Community Resource
Posts: 294
Joined: Fri Dec 03, 2010 4:39 am
Realm: Area 52 - US
Gender: Male

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Derax »

Got a question.. What is the chances that they are just place holder models? I can see blizzard tossing in these guys with teh recolored ones to test out the taming challenges and not wanting to ruin the surprise of the new models?

Deraxacus - Area 52 (US) (Horde)

User avatar
Kalliope
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 14063
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
Realm: Dethecus
Location: Thedas
Contact:

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Kalliope »

I believe we've heard through the grapevine that they're not placeholders. The numbers actually match up perfectly with Madexx's too: he has five colors total, three that aren't found on common models (since black will be available next patch - hi Dante!). Three unique, two "upgraded" commons. Plus, Skitterflame and Anthriss have more personality than the common spiders of the same color, much like the Madexx colors.

Image
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!

User avatar
Neurotoxinx
Posts: 49
Joined: Thu Jun 02, 2011 4:45 pm
Realm: Maelstrom (RP-PvP)
Gender: Female

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Neurotoxinx »

I can't say I'm disappointed - I want three out of the eight, that's not too bad!

I was upset initially, but then I got to looking at them. The spiders are cool brand new models (I think they're new, at least?). The owl is awesome. And I like the reskins of Gondria a lot. Some more variety would have been cool, I agree. Iunno - some magma scorpions would have been cool instead of so many spiders, maybe. But I'm plenty happy with this.
User avatar
Kalliope
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 14063
Joined: Wed Jan 06, 2010 4:40 am
Realm: Dethecus
Location: Thedas
Contact:

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Kalliope »

Yep, these lava spiders have never existed before. :) And Ban'thalos's wings have their really cool shiny trail effect that no other owl has!

Image
Kalliope's Pantheon of Pets
YouTube Edition
Thanks to Serenith for the avatar and signature!

User avatar
Ickabob
Artisan Hunter
Artisan Hunter
Posts: 519
Joined: Fri Nov 26, 2010 2:43 am
Realm: Proudmoore
Gender: Male
Location: Lost in the Appearance Tab. Send help!

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Ickabob »

Why do most of the rares have to be re-skins of the same mobs? The bird is nice but its just Olm 2.0, the spiders are neat but aren't there common versions of the new lava spiders? The new "gondria's" just seem lazy, I hope this isn't all Blizz has up their sleeves. Why couldn't one of the spiders look like Beth'ilak or maybe replace one of the cats with one of those awesome new hellhounds? Like others have said, hopefully now that these are out of the way, Blizz can give us some truly unique skins for rares. /end rant
User avatar
Nubhorns
Master Hunter
Master Hunter
Posts: 1217
Joined: Mon Jan 24, 2011 5:36 pm
Realm: WrA
Gender: Irrelevant
Location: Internet

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Nubhorns »

I need to set up a post macro that says "They're not being lazy, they're giving us skins that we asked for.". I hate that word when it comes to Blizz - Noah and the rest have been working very, very hard to get us what we want and when it rolls around people call it lazy because it's not 'brand new'.

I hate to resort to this argument but if you honestly think it's lazy, design, model and animate your own pets while working on a major content patch and do it while knowing very well that a bunch of people are going to find something to complain about no matter how hard you work. :P

As for the spiders, I've narrowed it down to the "Where are we? Firelands. What's in Firelands? Scorpids and spiders, pretty much. Let's put in rare spiders in skins that are otherwise unobtainable!". There will be times for cats and wolves and new skins and unicorns and things everyone wants in due time, I'm sure. We just have to be patient. ;)

|| deviantART || armory || magistream ||

User avatar
Novikova
Illustrious Master Hunter
Illustrious Master Hunter
Posts: 3264
Joined: Sat Oct 23, 2010 12:29 am
Realm: Moooooooon Guard. SC/FM.

Re: Anyone else disappointed by the new 4.2 rares?

Unread post by Novikova »

I might grab a spider for the first time ever for one of these fellows. Granted, I expect them to be horribly camped the first few weeks so I may do lazy loops or peep in at weird hours (lol second shift).
Image Sofia, the remarkably purple spirit cat as drawn by Ket Shi. :D

http://flightrising.com/main.php?p=lair ... e&id=50139 - Dragon Lair at flight rising!
Locked